Personal Development for Smart People Forums

Personal Development for Smart PeopleTM Forums

 

Go Back   Personal Development for Smart People Forums > Personal Development > World Affairs

Notices

World Affairs Politics, government, leadership, elections, global issues, environmental issues, economics, domestic policy, foreign policy, social change, human rights, civil liberty, healthcare, education, news, history, space exploration

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-31-2011, 06:40 PM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 185
1by1 is on a distinguished road
Default Nuclear Shutdown

So Germany will close all its nuclear plants and replace them with mostly coal and gas plants.

What do you think of this?

I find it a bit odd that nuclear plants will be replaced with coal plants, especially as the safety record for coal is far worse than for nuclear. I think the nuclear stories get blown up by the media because it is a new, "scary" technology, while coal is seen as old and safe.
1by1 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2011, 07:16 PM   #2 (permalink)
Family Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,629
openeyes is absolutely unstoppableopeneyes is absolutely unstoppableopeneyes is absolutely unstoppableopeneyes is absolutely unstoppableopeneyes is absolutely unstoppableopeneyes is absolutely unstoppableopeneyes is absolutely unstoppableopeneyes is absolutely unstoppableopeneyes is absolutely unstoppableopeneyes is absolutely unstoppableopeneyes is absolutely unstoppable
Default

That seems rather backward, given that coal plants emit more dangerous radiation/pollutants than nuclear. I could see a shift to more geothermal, wind, solar, and energy efficiency, but would rather see modern, latest generation nuclear plants with all their safety features put in than coal/gas.
openeyes is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 05-31-2011, 08:22 PM   #3 (permalink)
Family Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 2,296
KaleidoskopicVision is absolutely unstoppableKaleidoskopicVision is absolutely unstoppableKaleidoskopicVision is absolutely unstoppableKaleidoskopicVision is absolutely unstoppableKaleidoskopicVision is absolutely unstoppableKaleidoskopicVision is absolutely unstoppableKaleidoskopicVision is absolutely unstoppableKaleidoskopicVision is absolutely unstoppableKaleidoskopicVision is absolutely unstoppableKaleidoskopicVision is absolutely unstoppableKaleidoskopicVision is absolutely unstoppable
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by openeyes View Post
That seems rather backward, given that coal plants emit more dangerous radiation/pollutants than nuclear. I could see a shift to more geothermal, wind, solar, and energy efficiency, but would rather see modern, latest generation nuclear plants with all their safety features put in than coal/gas.
YES YES YES!

We need innovation! Clever ways of harnessing energy sources that go unused. Not the endless expansionism of a technocratic society mind you, but a smart way of using energy that otherwise goes to waste.

Mushrooms are another source of potential energy, as they are excellent at breaking down nearly any non biodegradable waste product (they eat oil!)
KaleidoskopicVision is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2011, 08:33 AM   #4 (permalink)
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: France - Japan - Korea
Posts: 3,241
aelle has a reputation beyond reputeaelle has a reputation beyond reputeaelle has a reputation beyond reputeaelle has a reputation beyond reputeaelle has a reputation beyond reputeaelle has a reputation beyond reputeaelle has a reputation beyond reputeaelle has a reputation beyond reputeaelle has a reputation beyond reputeaelle has a reputation beyond reputeaelle has a reputation beyond repute
Default

This is one of the reasons why the anti-nuclear movement pisses me off. Work on a pro-solar, pro-tidal, pro-geothermal energies, work on new biofuels (bacterial fuels are IMO one of the most amazing fields of research at the moment), make something that works. No one gave up horses because they were bad for the environment. They gave up horses when they could use cars.
aelle is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2011, 10:51 AM   #5 (permalink)
Family Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 6,439
cacheborn is shining brightlycacheborn is shining brightlycacheborn is shining brightlycacheborn is shining brightlycacheborn is shining brightlycacheborn is shining brightlycacheborn is shining brightlycacheborn is shining brightlycacheborn is shining brightlycacheborn is shining brightlycacheborn is shining brightly
Default

A knee-jerk reaction, IMO. Germany does not have the risk of earthquakes anywhere near that of Japan. Going back to coal and gas does not look very promising.

Last edited by cacheborn; 06-04-2011 at 11:22 AM. Reason: OCD :p
cacheborn is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2011, 06:35 AM   #6 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 363
Chris_1977 has a spectacular aura aboutChris_1977 has a spectacular aura about
Default

Time to read Taleb. See note #142 on this page. Opacity

Unfortunately, the criminals juggling small probabilities are everywhere nowadays. Under such circumstances nuclear energy is unsafe.
Chris_1977 is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 06-05-2011, 10:08 AM   #7 (permalink)
Family Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: NEW ENGLAND!!!!!!!
Posts: 1,701
garentee is a name known to allgarentee is a name known to allgarentee is a name known to allgarentee is a name known to allgarentee is a name known to allgarentee is a name known to all
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by aelle View Post
This is one of the reasons why the anti-nuclear movement pisses me off. Work on a pro-solar, pro-tidal, pro-geothermal energies, work on new biofuels (bacterial fuels are IMO one of the most amazing fields of research at the moment), make something that works. No one gave up horses because they were bad for the environment. They gave up horses when they could use cars.
Follow the money...the reason that the alternatives that you mentioned are not gaining more steam is that the larger scale energy producers are not interested in using any alternatives. What galls me most is that because of our experience with oil being able to transform humanity more than any other fuel source in our history, we are looking for a silver bullet to replace oil... It is not nuclear.....It is all of the sources that you listed above and then some...Those technologies do in fact work... Most are either cost prohibitive BECAUSE the larger energy producers are NOT interested in moving away from their cash cows. If we put all of the money towards research for the alternatives that we use in cleaning up oil spills etc I bet that we would be able to have several alternatives on a large scale..


I also think that since most governments fund a lot of energy companies could be a source of the lag in the alternatives....

I think turning away from nuclear energy is a fantastic idea....It is not a safe form of electricity. Ask the people in Fukishima about that... The people who had to be evacuated from the area and may not be able to go back home... To justify nuclear as being safe is rather dishonest.. There are no solutions for the waste....That was one of the bigger problems at Fukishima as it would be at any nuclear plant that got hit by a tidal wave after a big earth quake..

We have the technology... The money is going into the pockets of people who do not care about safe clean power..

I am not debating any more on this... This is my point of view, take it or leave it.
garentee is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nuclear Meltdown DerfVersus World Affairs 1 03-15-2011 12:20 AM
Nuclear Power secrets0stolen World Affairs 33 10-19-2010 04:07 PM
Erin's Forum Shutdown in 3...2...1... JoeRad Erin Pavlina 21 10-27-2009 11:45 PM
Nuclear Energy? Living2xcess World Affairs 3 09-04-2008 03:10 PM
The nuclear age escapee World Affairs 3 05-22-2008 11:32 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2010 by Pavlina LLC