| | |||||||
| World Affairs Politics, government, leadership, elections, global issues, environmental issues, economics, domestic policy, foreign policy, social change, human rights, civil liberty, healthcare, education, news, history, space exploration |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #31 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Europe
Posts: 219
| Quote:
Oh I dont want the government to take care of the environment, i think its unable to | |
| | |
| | #33 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Europe
Posts: 219
|
Yes, i know, but I for one dont I just read an interesting piece on a possible solution to stop the spill. Put simply the suggestion is to nuke it. The solution would work best if the surface is rocky, as it will shift easier and block the leakage. Apparently its been done before, primarily by russians in the old days, with great success. I just find it to be a simple solution, and should definately be looked into |
| | |
| | #34 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: KY
Posts: 824
|
I think this spill shows us how unprepared the companies are to deal with such accidents. Sure, they have the blow out preventer as a fail-safe, but where was their plan for a failure of the BOP? They keep coming up with new plans to contain the oil, all of which I hear have never been tested as such depths. Why do we allow companies to install a drilling rig in such an environment without having several fully tested plans in place to deal with various accidents? I consider this accident both a failure of the companies involved as well as a failure of the federal government. The spill comes at an interesting time, since Obama has proposed expanded offshore drilling. Perhaps this will cause them to ensure that the companies building and/or operating any new rigs have sufficient plans in place to prevent such accidents, or at least minimize their impacts. I'm not very hopeful however. The fact that some people seem more concerned about the lost oil than the damage to the environment shows up screwed up our priorities are in this country.
|
| | |
| | #35 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Europe
Posts: 219
|
You could argue that the seeping oil is lost property, and for this i sympasize. But we really dont know anything about the contracts. But one thing is certain, the involved parties has been unprepared. Why this is the case remains a mystery. Btw. is it the federal government who negotiates the oil driling contracts? Certainly the federal government is less concerned about an oil spill, than any local authority would be. So maybe there is the problem, centralization |
| | |
| | #37 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 282
| Quote:
Humans are always in a battle against nature. If you take environmentalism to it's farthest point.........it equals a world without humans. Truth be told..........this was an accident. I'm sure BP is doing all they can to make things right. They are going to suffer huge losses because of this. People will probably pay higher at the pump to cover those losses. Life is full of disasters. I think this is horrible. However, if my choice was between dolphins and fish..........or humans.........I would pick the dolphins and fish as tough as a choice as that is. And for those of you that hate oil so much...........try living without it for a while. While you condemn BP you are driving cars, using products, and basing your entire life around things that these people used their brains, resources, and lives to bring to you. The market has not found anything better than natural oil at this point. If you can do better, please do so. | |
| | |
| | #38 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: KY
Posts: 824
| Do you believe they are doing all they can to make things right because they care about doing what is right? Or because they need to the public think they care, to protect their image? What role do you believe that money (greed) played in the accident?
|
| | |
| | #39 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Europe
Posts: 219
|
I think its a case of growing lazy. Apparently you are not personally responsible for the corporation you are running. This removes the drive for corporations of doing things "right". And it is coincidentally beneficial for the government because they can always point to the corporations, when they in-turn do bad things, in attempts of giving the government more merit, more money, more power Anyway.. I think BP has grown lazy, which was what causes things to get out of shape and accidents to happen. It will also explain why it is so slow to stop the oil spill, in order to the prevent disaster from growing. Yes BP are doing the "right" thing, but they are lazy and slow because of government regulation that has removed certain fundamental responsibilies from management. Last edited by Double; 05-14-2010 at 01:01 PM. |
| | |
| | #40 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 282
|
Random Guy - I don't think greed or money played much into the accident at all. It was an accident. Oil men, nor anyone else, throws money away for fun. Are they doing all they can to make things right? I have no idea, but I would imagine they are. They do have competitors and they do have an image to keep. Plus, it's a tragedy. There is no benefit for them in this. And even if there was, you would have to imagine it would be secondary. Double - Oil gets taxed like crazy. Oil is over regulated as you know. They could do a lot more if the government got out of the way. Lazy? Maybe. I feel "hamstringed" is more like it. I'm not arguing these guys are angels by any means, btw. |
| | |
| | #42 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: KY
Posts: 824
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #43 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: England
Posts: 1,436
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #44 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 309
| Quote:
Henry Ford's original Model T was made to run on home brew alcohol, just like many early tractors. The reason was that farmers could produce it themselves. It is easier to run gasoline in an engine designed to run on alcohol rather than the other way round so the original Model T's were in actuality "Duel Fuel". Then John D. Rockefeller of Standard Oil fame started pressuring Ford to move to gasoline only cars and tractors. Henry Ford resisted but by 1920, John D. Rockefeller had secretly helped finance the Prohibition of alcohol in the United States so there was no more need of an alcohol burning or duel fuel engine since it was against the law to make alcohol. After WWII, it was General Motors that went around buying up all of the electric trolley lines in the US and closing them down so they could be replaced with diesel busses. President Eisenhower got on board by signing in the United States Autobahn, err I mean United States Interstate Highway System and THAT is how we in the USA got into our dependency of the Rockefeller's gasoline. | |
| | |
| | #45 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 464
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #46 (permalink) |
| Family Member Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,881
|
You can make a gas engion run a bunch of fuels with a little modifaction. I have run out of gas , I use propane from a 5 gal. tank to get me to a gas station. On alcohol you need a little more , with a carb. you open the jets a bit , with fuel inj. you do it electronicly. I have heard of cars running or karosine and running on wood smoke . There are people rite now running disel engions on used cooking oil . A quote from a differnt forum says Henry Ford used hemp to make his alcohol . The hemp competed with cotton for rope , the cotton farmers had hemp/weed made ileagle . desert rat
|
| | |
| | #47 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 309
|
I have been into diesel VW's since 2006. Jetta TDI's with some performance mods like bigger turbos, tuning and such. No matter how fast and stupid I drive, I never get less than 40 mpg. If I set the cruise to 60 mph on the interstate I can get close to 60 mpg... but who can do that? I hope to NEVER buy another gas burner ever again! I have learned that that alcohol needs around 14:1 compression or more to start burning efficiently. 87 octane gasoline tolerates around 10:1 compression maximum -and that is with aluminum heads. This is why alcohol is somewhat incompatible with gasoline. But in a properly modified engine, alcohol is a better fuel substitute for diesels because of their inherently higher compressions from a low of around 16:1 to 22:1 and higher. And among the best sources for bio-diesel is hemp oil... not marijuana, but the kind of hemp with no THC so it won't make you high if you smoke it. But we know the paper and chemical industry will never let hemp be grown in the USA, for fuel, renewable paper to save out trees or for any other reason. |
| | |
| | #48 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 464
| But could a new type of Rockefeller emerge to finance the hemp industry, produce environment-friendly fuel and lobby Congress to stop drillling and put strict limits on oil imports? The American people would support this.
|
| | |
| | #49 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: I'm a traveler everywhere and nowhere.. currently in Denver.. where else?
Posts: 3,618
| Quote:
So you can have conversations like this one | |
| | |
| | #50 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 282
| Quote:
However, you would think if it was really as good as the poster above states, that people would be lining up angel investors like crazy. "themaster" - you are talking in generalities. I'm talking specifics in this case. I don't think BP dumped oil on purpose. | |
| | |
| | #51 (permalink) | ||
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 464
| Quote:
Quote:
That's why I'm so fascinated about the Rockefeller story because sometimes, greed can be used for good, maybe in this case, it can produce a positive change. Last reports were that the oil is floating toward the Florida Keys. The more beaches/seafood industry and wildlife this spill destroys, the more angry people will get. It's the perfect opportunity for some mogul to get behind a new fuel source and launch a Prohibiltion style war against gasoline!! | ||
| | |
| | #52 (permalink) |
| Family Member Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 2,881
|
They sell a gas/alcohol mix like 10% . I know propane loves higher compression. If you were going to make a permant switch to alcohol you could mill your heads to get higher compression. I dont know about valve or ing. timeing. Maby some one has a cam for alcohol . I would think eathanol and methonal would burn a bit differnt . desert rat
|
| | |
| | #53 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: I'm a traveler everywhere and nowhere.. currently in Denver.. where else?
Posts: 3,618
| Quote:
The channel said.. our corporations won't be allowed to operate with "greed" as a motivation anymore.. if they don't start offering "well-being" to the people they will not be profitable.. they will go under.. So I agree with you.. there is a very good opportunity for BP (the one that had all those Environmental commercials) to really do some good There name if people don't remember means "Beyond Petroleum" Last edited by themaster; 05-18-2010 at 12:43 AM. | |
| | |
| | #54 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 464
| Quote:
What we need is a maverick company to say "Screw the oil barons and their environment-killing drills. Screw the oil sheiks in countries that are hostile to us. Run your cars on our homegrown brew. and it's cheaper too!" | |
| | |
| | #55 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 402
|
this must have happened before in the history of the world, there's no way all that oil has always been under the ground, it must've come up at some point. is there ecological damage, yeah. will the ecosystem survive, yeah. life on earth will continue. does this seriously threaten any part of the human race? well a few people in that area might have to change jobs, and some of our food is dead but beyond that, this is survivable. probably won't even effect me. per a previous poster, it doesn't seriously affect we. so overall, it doesn't seem like a big deal. we should try to contain it, and clean it up, and restart the oil rig if we can.
|
| | |
| | #56 (permalink) |
| Family Member Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,756
|
Another oil spill that is not getting attention... Africa's oil spills are far from U.S. media glare | Reuters |
| | |
| | #57 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 464
|
Why is nothing being done until Wednesday, when they will try to plug the leak with mud and concrete? It seems they are not working around the clock to get this thing stopped. Government officials keep saying that they are holding BP's feet to the fire. But BP seems to moving at a glacial pace, and by all accounts, doing minimal clean up/protection of wetlands. My idea would be for Obama to convene a panel of top experts from MIT, NASA, Army Corp of Engineers, Navy, etc. and hammer out the best solutions with the execs and engineers from BP and Haliburton then implement some "Overwhelming Force" to get the job done. |
| | |
| | #59 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,629
| Quote:
Right now this situation poses more risk to the domestic US than the middle east and should be getting a lot more assistance, with tens of thousands of people doing clean up on land, and as many boats/other vehicles doing whatever necessary to keep the oil from reaching land to begin with, even if that means having the Coast Guard give up the Drug War for a while and much of the military coming back to the US to work in the American Gulf. With the multiple US wars currently going on being largely tied to oil, in addition to spills like this, I hope there will be a much stronger move to renewable energy. I hardly see how wind/solar and mass public transit via trains could be more costly than this. | |
| | |
| | #60 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 342
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
| Tags |
| conscience, environment, ethics, petro-chem |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| I feel alone | shasah | Emotional Mastery | 12 | 04-12-2010 11:52 PM |
| feel sad and sad :( | qwerty | Personal Effectiveness | 2 | 02-15-2008 09:03 AM |
| When you just don't feel like doing it | Nani | Personal Effectiveness | 10 | 08-30-2007 06:27 PM |
| Feel What I Want... At Will | Senin | Emotional Mastery | 10 | 07-15-2007 09:36 PM |
| Feel bad to feel good? | Token | Emotional Mastery | 2 | 11-08-2006 03:35 AM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:50 PM.





