| | |||||||
| World Affairs Politics, government, leadership, elections, global issues, environmental issues, economics, domestic policy, foreign policy, social change, human rights, civil liberty, healthcare, education, news, history, space exploration |
|
Welcome to the Personal Development for Smart People Forums, the place for lively, intelligent discussion of all personal growth issues -- physical, mental, financial, social, emotional, spiritual, and more. You're currently viewing as a guest, which gives you limited read-only access. By joining our free community, you'll be able to post your own messages, access many members-only features, see the new messages posted since your last visit, and of course remove this header message. Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please join today. If you arrived here from a search engine, you may want to explore the main site first, which includes hundreds of deep and insightful articles on a variety of personal development topics. |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 190
|
The Medical establishment has always humiliated natural medicine. They've destroyed all practitioners of natural cancer cures as quacks. Now, you see this.. BBC NEWS | Health | Curry spice 'kills cancer cells' My opinion ? I think Cancer is the BIGGEST conspiracy ever in the realms of allopathy. Now please, supporters of western medicine, leave our natural cures alone and stick to your chemo. Don't expose our natural cures because when you do, them damn food corps like Monsanto are going to use Codex Alimentarius and hijack all natural earth's vegetation and fruits that could compete with their brother NWO medical MAFIA arms. Leave our Asian crops alone. You go on and cure your own cancer with your chemo poison toxic cocktails while we stick to our natural god given cures. Stay away from our crops, don't even try to Genetically modify them or use codex LAWs to prevent us from growing our own cures/crops. |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: USA/Mississippi
Posts: 978
|
does anyone else here feel like it is all that man-made synthetic stuff that creates runaway cells (i.e. cancer)? whether it's waves from electronics or preservatives and other food additives, seems to contribute quite a bit, esp. with things like colorectal cancer (food obviously would be involved somehow). seems as well that repressed emotions increase the risk, especially resentment. you know how they have the personality types - type A and type B? there's a third one, most people aren't familiar with it, they call it type C and have said the C could stand for cancer. (Personality Types A,B,C and Disease) <-- in that link they talk about one trait of the type c is eagerness to please... which often leads to resentment whether it's acknowledged or not. interesting news story. i don't know if i would say the medical establishment will remove curry as a food so they can get support for their own allopathic approach. i guess time will tell. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Moderator Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 4,978
|
If you eat the curry it doesn't have to end up in cancer cells. The article also doesn't say anything about the amount of curry that's needed. There are a lot of things that work while you have some cells isolated but that cease working for some a variety of reasons when there interaction with other bodily processes.
__________________ I am always open for feedback on my posts. If your feedback would go offtopic feel free to send me a Personal Message. My posts generally don't contain medical or legal advice, if you have a problem seek the opinion of an expert Talking about this in terms of “bad news” or “bad judgment by business leaders” seems archaic. It’s like describing World War One as “a serious diplomatic concern.” Bruce Sterling about the financial crisis. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 134
|
I don't believe there is any cancer conspiracy. I think it is what I would call "justifiable negative effects". There are A LOT of things we use each day that contain, emit, produce "Justifiable negative effects" like microwaves, man made sweetners, mobile phones, water (fluoride), toothpaste (fluoride), preservatives, addatives, wireless networks (wifi) etc. You have to remember that the world is run by capitalism and that means that capitalism > safety research. I know that in the pharmaceutical industy there are a lot of very strict regulations with releasing a new product but then there are still a lot of "Justifiable negative effects" that are allowed through the net like side effects. Another example is look at the luxury car industry. Performance cars like Ferrari's never get crash tested because it's too expensive for the test organisations to do it. I was told once of an article where an engineer looked over the build quality of a Ferrari and he said that the build quality was terrible. If safety research came first then it would be law that car manufacturers provided cars to be tested for free. In the same way that if peoples health came first then the government and companys would put more effort and research into holistic medicine, prevention, and healthy life styles. Last edited by hawkal; 10-31-2009 at 01:11 PM. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: east coast, USA
Posts: 1,405
|
Profit and lies are not specifically a western thing. Look what china passes off as food and medication: melamine, lead, sulfur, and toxin tainted products that we know for sure that are killing people. And not all medicine is profit and lies. That's an unfair and untrue generalization. If western medicine causes cancer, why do our pets (who don't get our medicines) also get cancer? Why do wild animals get cancer? Why do people in the rest of the world also get it? The reality is that people who live in a toxic, unhealthy, and unnatural way are more likely to have issues with disease. This is common sense. The question we should be asking is how we can get people to take more responsibility for their own health? |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 313
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,456
|
I seem to recall the movie "The Constant Gardener" was about this, profiting off disease in order to sell more drugs. FDA plays a part too by making it difficult to get experimental drugs approved. Fortunately... I think our best cures are generated from within. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 50
|
I think its a little bit silly to call cancer a conspiracy! But yes, medicine is about companies making money, not about looking out for the poor ill people. That's why universal socialist healthcare is the best option in my opinion. |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Is Our Money-Driven Medicine Really the Best? | stanmrak | World Affairs | 25 | 09-17-2009 10:26 AM |
| If my uncle gets cancer,who is responsible for his cancer? | Jack | Intention-Manifestation | 24 | 06-19-2009 01:18 PM |
| using your for-profit business to run a non-profit event | tracyrtwyman | Business & Financial | 0 | 06-26-2008 06:14 PM |
| Profit/non-profit website idea? | musicismypill | Business & Financial | 5 | 07-14-2007 09:52 PM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:28 PM.






