| | |||||||
| World Affairs Politics, government, leadership, elections, global issues, environmental issues, economics, domestic policy, foreign policy, social change, human rights, civil liberty, healthcare, education, news, history, space exploration |
|
Welcome to the Personal Development for Smart People Forums, the place for lively, intelligent discussion of all personal growth issues -- physical, mental, financial, social, emotional, spiritual, and more. You're currently viewing as a guest, which gives you limited read-only access. By joining our free community, you'll be able to post your own messages, access many members-only features, see the new messages posted since your last visit, and of course remove this header message. Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please join today. If you arrived here from a search engine, you may want to explore the main site first, which includes hundreds of deep and insightful articles on a variety of personal development topics. |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
|
Thought I'd post this since I see it touched on in several threads. The impact on revenues, and the economy by lowering taxes (across the board). The Historical Lessons of Lower Tax Rates The View From 1776 | The View From 1776 | What Happens When Liberals Raise Taxes Raising revenue by lowering taxes « Roger Helmer MEP |
| |||
|
Firstly you are probably aware that the heritage foundation is a anti-tax lobby group and Roger Helmer is a Politicans with a seat in the European parlament. You didn't choose to quote economists but choose biased sources that don't researched economics with academic standards. First the important thing when you discuss basic economic things like how taxes effect the economy that no rational case that doesn't include a lot of math can be a reasonable argument that explains that a theory works. I think your links come basically down to the supply side economics argument: "Higher revenues for lower tax rates. But this elegant economic theory actually works." Specifically the claim is that the revenues would be higher or the same than they would be if the tax rates wouldn't have lowered. It's the you can have the cake and eat it too argument. The majority of academic economists considers supply side economics a fringe theory, that isn't true. McCain sticks to supply-side economics despite evidence it doesn't work - International Herald Tribune is an article about McCain relationship with the concept. Quote:
And that the main problem in this election. We have a party that runs a course that's beyond the reach of science and decides based on belief.
__________________ I am always open for feedback on my posts. If your feedback would go offtopic feel free to send me a Personal Message. My posts generally don't contain medical or legal advice, if you have a problem seek the opinion of an expert Talking about this in terms of “bad news” or “bad judgment by business leaders” seems archaic. It’s like describing World War One as “a serious diplomatic concern.” Bruce Sterling about the financial crisis. |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Economy is a videogame | ar81 | Personal Effectiveness | 14 | 08-20-2008 05:54 AM |
| Effects of the current economy | {aspiring_to_clarity} | World Affairs | 12 | 06-23-2008 04:28 PM |
| complaining about gas prices/economy. | cylon | Intention-Manifestation | 10 | 06-06-2008 02:01 PM |
| The Real Economy | Dan.Linehan | Business & Financial | 3 | 12-13-2007 04:56 AM |
| 30 Day financial challenge- fuel economy | WanderingOak | Business & Financial | 4 | 05-15-2007 02:17 PM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:18 AM.






