| | |||||||
| World Affairs Politics, government, leadership, elections, global issues, environmental issues, economics, domestic policy, foreign policy, social change, human rights, civil liberty, healthcare, education, news, history, space exploration |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Family Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,545
|
Here's a cool new technology that could solve some of our food production problems: YouTube - Vertical farming Global Warming Organic produce, uses 20x less water, can be done in urban environments (reducing transport requirements), and initial tests indicate that it is actually profitable. Valcent Products Inc,. - High Density Vertical Growth System - High Density Vertical Growth - Fri Jul 11, 2008 Valcent Products Inc,. - News Releases - Valcent's Releases Profitable Initial Production Estimates For its Vertical Vegetable Growing Systems - Fri Jul 11, 2008... |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 783
|
That's cool. There's a similar concept I've been studying lately called permaculture: Permaculture: Ten steps to an Organic no-dig Garden |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Family Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 8,749
|
Is there somewhere a analyses that holds the costs in numbers against the benefits of growing food that way? You much do you have to pay to produce some fruit in a vertical farm compared to traditional farming? |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,545
|
This is from the last link I posted, the closest I could find to a cost analysis: Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Family Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 2,545
|
I'm not sure, probably the most expensive thing is the pumps and the controllers and there is usually some economy of scale with these types of things. So it is probably not profitable to run in your back yard, as cool as that would be.
|
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 727
|
A very cool idea, or rather assembly of various ideas into a coherent whole. It looks like they incorporate architecture, urban alternative fuel, water treatment, water reuse, greenhouse effects, and soil supplementation. The overhead for such a project would be crippling. Perhaps Dubai would be interested, or Saudi Arabia, both of which are notorious for large, technologically advanced construction projects. The benefits to a city once the technology was running would be immediate and substantial. A partial implementation would probably fail due to the high costs of operation absent the multiple treatment technology. These would be strategically dubious from a military point of view, as they provide a visible and vulnerable target to damage food production, waste disposal, water supply, and morale. I think we'll be hearing more about this... |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 8,749
| Quote:
Brides, highways and rails that you need to transport food to the right location are a better target. In addition the food is better protected from plagues. Both natural plagues and manmade plagues. If you both produce the food nearer to the market and protect it by isolating it from the enviroment the gains I think the food system become less prone to distruption. Because a vertical farm is better isolated from the enviroment it is also a place where you can grow gen manipulated stuff with less risk that it goes into the enviroment. | |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:32 AM.




