| | |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| World Affairs Politics, government, leadership, elections, global issues, environmental issues, economics, domestic policy, foreign policy, social change, human rights, civil liberty, healthcare, education, news, history, space exploration |
|
Welcome to the Personal Development for Smart People Forums, the place for lively, intelligent discussion of all personal growth issues -- physical, mental, financial, social, emotional, spiritual, and more. You're currently viewing as a guest, which gives you limited read-only access. By joining our free community, you'll be able to post your own messages, access many members-only features, see the new messages posted since your last visit, and of course remove this header message. Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please join today. If you arrived here from a search engine, you may want to explore the main site first, which includes hundreds of deep and insightful articles on a variety of personal development topics. |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| At the moment there is a poll @ Prospect about the top intellectuals. I have voted for Paul Krugman, Mohamed Yunus, Jared Diamond, Lawrence Lessig and Steven Pinker. Who is your choice?
__________________ I am always open for feedback on my posts. That might focused on the argument at hand or on my writing style. If your feedback would go offtopic feel free to send me a Personal Message. Reality is fragile |
| |||
| Note the difference between the top intellectual and the top public intellectual. That's an extremely important distinction. Anyway, it's an interesting list that they've compiled. I think I'll need a bit more research before making my descision... |
| |||
| To me, there is no top intellectual. In an infinite Universe, there will ALWAYS be someone who equally as intelligent, less intelligent, or more intelligent than the individual. And based on my spiritual view the we are all One Being, you would not only be the most intelligent person in existence and but also the least intelligent, and all the grey areas in between. |
| |||
| Last I checked Guinness World Records listed Marilyn vos Savant as the smartest person alive, and many historians and musicologists alike classify Mozart to be the smartest human to have ever lived. |
| |||
| Richard Dawkins, J. Craig Venter, and Fernando Henrique Cardoso (our former president). I don't know the majority of the others anyways Hah Pope Benedict XVI in the list? Is that some sort of joke? If there was any list he should be in, it should be in some sort of the most retrograde and limited minds of our time, 2nd only to the dear president Mr. Bush and some other neo-cons out there...
__________________ All that matters is results. Turbo mode now! Full schedule. Bye bye. |
| |||
| Trust me--George W. Bush isn't nearly as bad as folks like Ted Haggard, Bob Enyart, Fred Phelps, Pat Robertson, and Dr. Paul Cameron. |
| |||
| Quote:
Maybe not but he's the one with the most influence so the damages he causes to the world are greater.
__________________ All that matters is results. Turbo mode now! Full schedule. Bye bye. |
| |||
| Then let's just be glad that Bob Enyart and Paul Cameron aren't as in charge, since they've publicly advocated atrocities such as the genocide of all gay people. |
| |||
| Quote:
Quote:
He didn't do much outside of physics. Quote:
__________________ I am always open for feedback on my posts. That might focused on the argument at hand or on my writing style. If your feedback would go offtopic feel free to send me a Personal Message. Reality is fragile |
| |||
|
__________________ Download free pc games | Play relaxing games |Free car games | Dress up games | Arcade games |
| |||
| the biggest problem i see with this is that the smartest people are not always the most influential. people confuse the two quite often. someone can be brilliant, but that doesn't mean anyone will listen to them. if nobody listens to them, how would they know to vote for them? |
| |||
| Me... in 200 years. :-P Well, I think the Economists mentioned by Brutha have some pretty good ideas. If we talk about intellectuals, i.e. people with ideas and not hard intelligence, I'd say there are few other people I actually know about in-depth. From the list of Prospect, I have heard about some of them but never studied all of them thoroughly (except Krugman and Yunus, but that's because I study economics... and Krugman also writes textbooks for students). In any case, I voted Ramachandran, Daniel Dennett and Jeffrey D. Sachs, since in my perception they have the potential to change many things in the world, even if at abstract level. |
| |||
| Quote: |
| |||
| Quote: Go Ron Paul!
__________________ The Catfight Report - News and Reviews relating to the world of female wrestling, fighting, and combat. |
| |||
| To be serious, I'm sorry to say I'm not familiar with many of the people on that list. I guess I better get readin'. Then again, these people have Al Gore on the list, so maybe I'm not missing much. |
| |||
| Ya I'm kind of surprised he's not up there too. In the same vein I think Aubrey de Grey should have been included as well, with a beard like his you pretty much have to be a genius.
__________________ ImprovedLives.com | Self-Help 2.0: How to use Psychology for Personal Growth |
| |||
| I wonder whether compiling a list like this really has any merit. The website says the only criteria is that they have to be alive and have the distinction of "influencing debate" globally. Seems to me like most people will just vote for those whose ideas they agree with. Is someone like Al Gore really "influencing debate" when he agrees with the general consensus about global warming? There is not really much of a mainstream debate about that issue is there? Or take Richard Dawkins, who I like for his theories on evolution rather than his recent crusade against religion. I think he is up there more for the latter than the former. Is there really a serious debate going on about creationism vs evolution? Most people who stir up debate on an issue aren't popular for that exact reason. It's only when we later on come to agree with their ideals that we consider them to be a great intellectual. Last edited by schola : 05-12-2008 at 03:59 PM. |


