Personal Development for Smart People Forums

Personal Development for Smart PeopleTM Forums

 

Go Back   Personal Development for Smart People Forums > Steve & Erin Pavlina > Steve Pavlina

Notices

Steve Pavlina Discuss ideas, articles, and podcasts from StevePavlina.com. New threads are automatically generated for Steve's latest blog posts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-23-2009, 10:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Northern California
Posts: 3,030
pyrogen has a brilliant futurepyrogen has a brilliant futurepyrogen has a brilliant futurepyrogen has a brilliant futurepyrogen has a brilliant futurepyrogen has a brilliant futurepyrogen has a brilliant futurepyrogen has a brilliant futurepyrogen has a brilliant futurepyrogen has a brilliant futurepyrogen has a brilliant future
Default Poly question for Steve and anyone else

Steve,

I've been wondering - you mentioned in your own writing about poly that it's not necessarily about having sex with people other than your wife.

Could you explain why you need to be poly to have the other relationships you want, if they weren't going to be sexual? Is it just about being *open* to that?

The reason for my question actually is because I've had a quandary for many years now - when single, I've had a network of very supportive, intimate friendships that took the place of a primary partner. These relationships were so satisfying and my traditional boyfriend/girlfriend relationships were so unsatisfying that I always feel like I'm "settling" for relationships. The only thing missing is sex and being in love... or at least, being able to define ourselves as in love.

I had a "best friend with benefits" for years, we dated other people, but never defined each other ourselves as boyfriend/girlfriend because of the implications of shutting out other people. We weren't going to get married or move on into the future with each other and we didn't want to close off our possibilities. Whenever either of us was actually seeing someone (usually me, because he was openly poly and I was in denial) the relationship stayed the same but the "benefits" stopped.

Due to my network of intimate friends, I was never alone on any night that I didn't want to be alone. I always had a date for any event I could want to go to and I always had someone with whom to see any movie I wanted to see! There was physical closeness, though not sex. Sex and romance is what usually sent me out of the network.

Whenever I got into an intimate relationship however the tendency would be to draw a tight circle around myself and the partner, shutting these friendships out. I've found my intimate relationships to be almost suffocatingly lonely, and my partners almost always are uncomfortable with the amount of intimacy and closeness I have with other people. I always find that my partner doesn't give me enough physical affection but I'm now denied the option of getting it from anywhere else. The issue isn't enough sex - it's enough affection and emotional/intellectual intimacy! In relationships, I find myself cutting off from my friend network because I don't really know how to be friends with people in the more superficial way that most people seem to do. My friendships all seem to go really, really deep.

I have always bemoaned that I don't seem to have intimate partners who can even hold a candle to any one of my friends, and I wonder if having a more open relationship model (where my partner had no problem with me having fuzzier social boundaries outside of the relationship) might be the answer. I still have always wanted a primary partner. I just don't want it at the expense of cutting myself off from everyone else I've ever cared for. I need more social contact outside of my relationship than just getting together with The Joneses for bridge one hour a week.

There's also the issue that primary live in partners seem to inevitably have... when your partners stop being as nurturing, sexual and supportive as they once were because of resentments over financial and household responsibility. I've been in two relationships now where the unconditional support that there was in the beginning, ended up falling victim to resentments over domestic issues.

Sometimes I wonder if poly would be a better model for me, if I wasn't already poly after a fashion, just we didn't call it that.

Last edited by pyrogen; 01-23-2009 at 10:58 PM.
pyrogen is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2009, 11:57 PM   #2 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 105
polyfulcrum is on a distinguished road
Default

It is quite possible to explore polyamory without having a primary partner. One of hallmarks of being poly is having the option to enjoy connections with people that aren't necessarily domestic partnership material, or just having a higher level of independence than traditional relationship structures tend to support.

It sounds like the trick for you is more in the nature of allowing your friendships to move in a direction that supports more of your needs, including your sexual needs. Why do you pull back from sharing all levels of intimacy within your connections, as long as it's consensual, honest, and responsible?
polyfulcrum is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2009, 03:25 PM   #3 (permalink)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NYC
Posts: 384
gingerbaker is a glorious beacon of lightgingerbaker is a glorious beacon of lightgingerbaker is a glorious beacon of lightgingerbaker is a glorious beacon of lightgingerbaker is a glorious beacon of lightgingerbaker is a glorious beacon of light
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polyfulcrum View Post
It sounds like the trick for you is more in the nature of allowing your friendships to move in a direction that supports more of your needs, including your sexual needs. Why do you pull back from sharing all levels of intimacy within your connections, as long as it's consensual, honest, and responsible?
I second all the above. It seems to me that you have been very much enjoying polyamory but have been unwilling to accept that label for yourself, and by trying to fit yourself into the monogamy model that society expects, you are boxing yourself in and making yourself quite unhappy. If you are at a point now where you are more comfortabel accepting your non-mainstreamness, why not try looking for a primary partner among poly-identified people? At worst it doesn't work out - but that won't be any worse than your past experiences, and the potential for it to go very well seems quite high.
gingerbaker is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in TechnoratiFurl this Post!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Going Poly Parthon Health & Fitness 3 01-15-2009 06:38 PM
Question for Steve concerning Soy. Spirittap Health & Fitness 29 07-30-2008 02:04 PM
Question for Steve Rosie Steve Pavlina 0 05-09-2008 01:13 AM
Question for Steve PianoManGidley Steve Pavlina 2 04-03-2008 01:22 AM
Question for steve: FutureBillionaire Personal Effectiveness 1 11-30-2006 09:11 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:52 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2010 by Pavlina LLC