| | |||||||
| Steve Pavlina Discuss ideas, articles, and podcasts from StevePavlina.com. New threads are automatically generated for Steve's latest blog posts. |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 250
|
It might seriously mess you up if you decide not to polarize that way. This is what happened to me. I have been doing energy work with a healer and its been a real challenge getting rid of all the negativity within me. In my personal experience and from reading spiritual writings very few people can polarize as a darkworker. You have to polarize to nearly 100% in order to get that negativity to work for you effectively. There will always be darkworkers, because reality as we know it is created by polarity, but the design of the Universe is intended to have more lightworkers. Just like there are millions more stars than black holes. Being a dark worker is like being a black hole. IMO, and Steve may not agree with this, but I get this from channeled material from an entity called "RA" (do a google search on it) To be a light worker you just need to be around 51 to 60 percent polarized to the light. But to be a darkworker you need to be nearly 100% polarized to the dark side. So for example being 60 % polarized to the dark just drags you down. Also polarized darkworkers are part of a spiritual hierarchy. So tyhere will be powerful entities over you. You invite these powerful entities into your life by messing around with this. If you have a tendency to be more of a lightworker, they will take advantage of you opening up to them and use it as an opportunity to neutralize you and render you ineffective. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Homeless
Posts: 3,548
|
good post mate, I dont understand the higher level darkworkers i dont understand what purpose they serve. I have been working with outflow energy, I can see the benefits and challenges of both. they look 50-50 to me. I wonder if lightworkers think about what would have happen if they chose to be a darkworker and vice versa, anybody here who can help?? |
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: in your fridge
Posts: 2,018
|
Unless I'm missing something, it's much more simple than that. You either hold selfish intentions or greater-self intentions. One generates fear energy, the other love. All this hierarchy stuff sounds very abstract and esoteric, Theo. As to the nagativity thing... You can use postive or negative motivation whichever side of the energy spectrum you're using. e.g. A lightworker might be motivated by seeing people suffer. That's negative. Or a darkworker might be motivated by a desire to get a new car. That's not negative. That's a positive desire. Fear doesn't have to be avoidance. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 2
|
Excuse me, but where do you people get all this metaphysical garbage from? Am I the only one on this forum who is sceptical of these vague, made up theories? Are categorizations like dark-this and light-that even useful? The Steve Pavlina site has taught me to be more free-thinking. This seems to go in the opposite direction, of using limiting categorization to create a narrower world-view. |
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 250
| Quote:
So, if this polarization thing resonates with you, you can decide to read only what Steve Pavlina has to say on the matter, consider it to be the last word on the subject and maybe wait with bated breath until his next post on it. OR you could look into the subject yourself through other sources. These sources aren't going to be from a mainstream perspective. Its going to be weird esoteric occult type stuff. But I hate to break it to you but most "personal development" stuff is the same way. Its basically watered down esoteric stuff. So I would hazzard a guess that lots of these people Jack Canfeild and all the other personal development "gurus" featured on things like "The Secret" have read lots of "Woo Woo" type stuff and boiled down what they wanted and presented it in a more mainstream way. | |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 250
|
So anyway, my point is this a heavy thing to get into. This dark working thing. Maybe "30 day trial" and Darkworking shouldn't have been put in the same sentence. And also, I think its possible (warning this may sound "woo woo" ) that some people may have incarnated to Earth to be a Lightworker but forgot, like everyone does when they pass through"the veil" and maybe got kind of pissed off at the world, so for these people messing with trying your hand at Darkworking may be a very bad idea. BECAUSE, entities out there, you know DEMONS, may know more about your mission in life than you do, they may have your number, so to speak, and may take this opportunity to screw with you and render you an ineffective light worker, because they know you aren't meant to be on their team, anyway. So just some thoughts. I did a 30 day darkworrker trial and took it seriously and I think I did learn from it but I wouldn't recommend it. I think we all have a dark side though. "Dark" might mean simply thigs you aren't aware of about yuorself. But it can be negative in the true sense of the word too. But from what I have researched polarized darkworkers are much less common than lightworkers and its harder to polarize to darkness. It takes more commitment and its basically being in a situation of no trust in anything. No love for anything. Its not really even self love, IMO. Its self delusion. Egocentric narcissistic type self love. True love of self recognizes that we are all connected. Egocentric self love is seperation. The degree of seperation needed to be a polarized darkworker is to cut off parts of your self even from other parts of your own self, like your heart, and think of it as "other" But with serious commitment like 100% commitment, you can do it. But its hardcore. Its not a joke. Its being a sociopath. Its being like the character "Kaiser Souse" in the movie "The usual suspects" and being willing to kill your own children in order to build your empire. Its not like trying a "sham wow" for 30 days and being unhappy and getting your money back. |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 250
|
OK, I guess I spelled it wrong. here is the character I am referring to: http://http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Keyser_S%C3%B6ze Quote:
Its not about wanting a new car because you think you deserve it or inocuous things like that. | |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 388
| Quote:
Last edited by missing; 12-08-2008 at 06:18 PM. | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 22
|
The way I understand Steve's paradigm about LW/DW polarisation is this: Let's imagine that a person is at a certain point on the spectrum of light to dark -worker polarity. To him it currently appears as though light-working and dark-working are two different directions -- and they are, from where he is looking at it. However, it's as though the line that stretches to the left and right of where he is, eventually curves inwards to form a circle, such that eventually the two ends of the spectrum meet, it's just that the radius of the circle is a bit too big, so that a person standing at a point feels like LW and DW mindsets are in two opposite directions. When we go to the good extreme to become a lightworker, we eventually realise that to be able to help humanity, we first need to sustain our own body (remember the P/PC principle), thus we have to allot some time and resources for our own focussed development. When we go to the other end and become a darkworker, we realise that we cannot possibly do everything on our own, and thus we have to rely on other people, and thus we need to be kind to them and help them. I suppose you could say that the lightworker mindset person helps people out because helping out people is a first-order desire (virtue ethics), whereas the darkworker mindset person helps people out as a means to an end (consequentialism). I hope I made some sense there. |
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 22
|
>Maybe "30 day trial" and Darkworking shouldn't have been >put in the same sentence. Apparently though, Steve might suggest something like that. |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Starting a 30 day Trial in the middle of another 30 Day Trial - Good/Bad? | WayToTwilight | Personal Effectiveness | 4 | 02-15-2009 12:59 PM |
| 30 day salad-before-meals trial problem? | makessense | Health & Fitness | 11 | 02-26-2008 10:20 PM |
| My 30 day Darkworker Trial | Theo77 | Steve Pavlina | 28 | 04-28-2007 08:47 PM |
| 30 day darkworker trial | peacefulmind | Steve Pavlina | 9 | 04-03-2007 03:27 AM |
| Is everyone really a darkworker? | VacMan | Steve Pavlina | 3 | 03-22-2007 09:26 PM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:02 AM.




