| | |||||||
| Spirituality, Consciousness, & Awareness Spirituality, beliefs, the nature of reality, consciousness, awareness, metaphysics, truth, philosophy, religion |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #122 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 346
| Quote:
I read it a long time ago, but as I remember it it was Peter, not Jesus which cursed the tree. Then when Peter complained to Jesus about it, Jesus schooled him. Unless, it is another part which I didnt read though. If you can kill a tree, why not simply create said fruit? Or order your body to cease being hungry. | |
| | |
| | #123 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 857
| I am pretty serious about immortality. Have you heard about the latest news in science ? - they have invented the method to make an Electronic Human by gradually substituting the whole ...body... by artificial parts with electronic chips (in case something in the ...hmm... body ..... is worn out and cannot be fixed). This Electronic Human will have consciousness of the former original person, and scientists call this new breakthrough directly and openly - Immortality of the Human.
|
| | |
| | #124 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 564
| Quote:
Would you like me to come to you and wash your feet with my tears? It's merely the definition of the word that you can't seemingly to get your head around, but hey I'll even accept your definition, for it isn't that far from mine and there are many more worthy causes than that, to fight over. Yet it appears even that isn't going to be enough for you. Or on the other hand perhaps you've advanced far enough to be able to walk through the empty space in a tree like an aparition, so have an entirely different reality to me??? If not, then accept we live in precisely the same universe, same reality, even if we may see it a little differently. | |
| | |
| | #125 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,613
| Jesus and the Fig Tree Quote:
It's not as if he hasn't plucked food out of thin air before. Jesus feeding 5,000 people with fish and bread, remember. It's a repeat of an old trick by the prophet Elisha. | |
| | |
| | #127 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,613
| Quote:
Ex-forummer Tom Booth has also related how he helped his brother's car to pass through a electric pole, ummm, yes, in apparition-style. Kinda saved his brother's life, in a car accident. Read his account here. Having everything you've ever dreamed in the next ten seconds. My wife also walked through solid glass doors before, although not quite in the way you might expect. And there were certain unintended consequences. (I just tried to do a search, but my old post didn't come up) ... | |
| | |
| | #128 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,613
| Quote:
controlling other people You need to read Post No. 20 and No. 36 - you only get the full story, if you read both. | |
| | |
| | #129 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,613
|
Oh yeah, Milarepa did a related sort of trick, with big solid rock. He pressed his hand on it and made an imprint. That was 800 years ago, the rock is still around. Here's a modern account from someone who went to see the rock recently: The Science of Miracles - Gregg Braden - Heal Your Life Bold italics below are mine. Quote:
Last edited by Acting Like Godot; 11-21-2011 at 07:57 AM. | |
| | |
| | #130 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 564
| Quote:
Yet it is a little easier to visualise in a physical sense, which is how it is being explained here. We (physically) see the (physical) world through two (physical) eyes, which through the normal process that takes place in the brain; between the two retinas and our interpretation of what they have picked up; being two separated images, which are then merged into the one image we recognise. This is healthy vision and with it we receive the clarity of physical perception we desire. But now add some disruption into this process and we might end up with double-vision, which may sound like an advantage, but can be like it would be better to have none at all. So it is with our SPIRITUAL perception. Rather than our physical eyes, this time the two sources are our Objective and Subjective perceptions. Again, unless these are merged in the optimum manner, we end up with a spiritual double-vision according perception, and as such we receive very little spiritual light (understanding of reality) - indeed into the soul; being in turn; the fullness of being that we are. | |
| | |
| | #131 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 346
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #132 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,613
| LOL, I cheated a bit in my description .... It sounds more dramatic than it really is. But sign up for the course, it will open your eyes to lots of different things, not just this. Really, there's little practical value in walking through a wall. Just use the door instead. There are far more practical things you can learn from the Silva Method course, such as psychic diagnosis. Here's an account of one example of my wife doing it: Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #133 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 346
|
This make me wonder, what will happen if one who has 100% mastered this show this to a hardcore skeptic..... no not even a skeptic, a naysayer? If the naysayer will totally reject it, will the master experience a reality where the naysayer saw it but the naysayer will experience a reality where the master failed? |
| | |
| | #134 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,613
| Quote:
Some members of the crowd would have said, "Ooooh! An amazing miracle!" Others would have said, "What a fraud! Lazarus must have been faking his death all this time." | |
| | |
| | #136 (permalink) | |||
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 475
| Quote:
Quote:
ALG, you just said that you can walk through walls and your wife can walk through glass doors. Surely, mentally causing a little tree to wither or instantly produce fruit is within your grasp, right? In the Jesus story above, Peter was able to actually "see" the results of Jesus' "curse" that withered the fig tree. Therefore, it should be easy enough for you to video tape, or arrange for a live television broadcast of this ability that you and your wife possess. In which case, just like Peter, the rest of us will be able to see the extent to which you and your wife have freed yourselves from "mental constraints." So then, how 'bout it? seeds | |||
| | |
| | #137 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,613
|
And the purpose of this would be ...? A few years ago, I was very interested in manifesting money. I'd write here on these forums and say, "Ok, I'm going to manifest for thousands of dollars, I have no idea from where, but I'd expect it to come really fast." A few days would pass, then weird things would happen, and hey presto, the thousands of dollars would find some way to arrive in my reality, from some unexpected source. At that time, i'd write all the details and even scan all the relevant documents, cheques, letters, contracts etc and post them on this forum as proof. And some people would say, "0ooh, that is amazing! I feel so inspired, thank you for sharing your story!". And others would say, "It is just by coincidence that this happened, a short time after you manifested." and yet others would say, "You're lying and faking these documents." That is why the Buddha disliked performing miracles. Don't take it from me, look it up yourself with Google. Buddha's own teachings talk a lot about gaining enlightenment, but say nothing about miracles. The accounts given by people around him however show that he did perform quite awesome miracles but did not like attention to be drawn to them. Principally, there were two reasons for this. Firstly, the Buddha did not like people to be distracted from the ultimate goal of enlightenment, by the spectacular pyrotechnics of miracles. Secondly, the Buddha simply did not like dealing with skeptics and accusations of fraud etc. So he kept most miracles quite private or when he felt a strong need to perform them, to deal with a given situation. As for myself, I also do not like to explore paranormal stuff just because it's paranormal. These things can go wrong; have gone wrong on me; can lead to unpleasant consequences. If you want to know one specific example of what I mean, look up old posts on my views on channelling. I generally advise people against this, because in my experience and in my view, unpleasant entities can come through. That is why I now restrict my LOA activities to highly practical purposes. I will manifest for a wide range of practical things - money; good health; new jobs; taxis; instant cures to headaches; quick fixes for damaged electrical appliances etc etc - but i do not go and play with the paranormal for the fun of it. Finally, it's important to note that not all miracle-makers are alike. You make miracles (or paranormal effects) to the extent you are able to bend, stretch or flex your mind in different ways. But what Jesus could do with his mind was probably not exactly the same as what Buddha could do, or Milarepa could do, or Said Baba could do, or Matthew Manning, or Simon Magus, or Saint Francis Of Assisi, or Osho, or John Chang, or Erin Pavlina, or Daniel Dunglas Home, or Nostradamus, or Uri Geller, or that Brazilian healer nicknamed "John of God", or Moses. Etc etc, just naming a few individuals. They are all different people, with different personalities, different philosophies and different minds. What happened was that each of them, in their own way, understood that their minds could interact with reality, and each of them explored this phenomenon, in their own way, producing in some cases strikingly similar effects and in other cases very different ones. And I too am exploring in my own way .... And so are plenty of other people in the world. If you want videos and other evidence of the paranormal, go look for them yourself. There are plenty, plenty, plenty! If I added a couple more, they would not be any significant addition to the overall library. Go to Youtube, look up the videos of John Chang setting fire to objects with his mind, look up the videos of Nina Kulagina. Look up the scientific papers in Nature by Russell Targ on Uri Geller, or the one about the Tibetan monks generating body heat to dry wet sheets. Look at Erin Pavlina's photos of orbs when she went to tHat haunted place with a team of people. Google Sam Shoeman and see how he killed himself with nothing but his own mind. Alex Lenkei's entire surgery without anaesthesia was fully videotaped by the hospital authorities! Etc etc. So much evidence in the world! But because skeptics are also the powerful creators of their reality, such evidence cannot change their reality unless they are prepared to change their own minds. Here, a small tidbit to titillate your imagination. Phenomena like this is quite well-known in China, just not well-known to the rest of the world YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Here is the same telekinetic "mind over matter" ability, applied in a different context: YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. And another one, same idea: YouTube - Broadcast Yourself. Last edited by Acting Like Godot; 11-21-2011 at 01:34 PM. |
| | |
| | #138 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 475
| The purpose would be to put up or shut up. Quote:
The objective reality of this universe is not connected to your personal will in the same way that the subjective reality of your own mind is connected to your will. No matter how much you boast, just as you cannot reach into my mind or Apopohis Reject's mind to grasp and wield the substance that comprises our personal thoughts and dreams, likewise, the same applies to the substance of the universe (God's mind). It doesn't belong to you ALG. seeds | |
| | |
| | #139 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,613
|
But none of this alters the laws of physics. More precisely, Newtonian physics are defied, but it all fits nicely with quantum physics / mechanics. For instance, we already know from quantum physics that the principle of locality does not have to apply. Distance is irrelevant - one thing happening in one part of the universe can affect another thing in another part of the world at the speed of light. We also know that time is also irrelevant. With quantum entanglement, the behaviour of a particle in the present can affect the behavior of a particle in the past. If you grasp all that, you will see why apparently impossible things can be doe - such as psychics seeing the future; or sensing what happened in the past even though they were not there to witness events; or faith healing occurring over long distances. All of these are possible, because time and distance can be quite irrelevant, counter-intuitive as it may sound. |
| | |
| | #140 (permalink) | ||
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,613
| Quote:
Here is a publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, about an experiment that shows otherwise. In this experiment, the thoughts of a group of people affect the molecular structure of substances thousands of miles away: Radin, D., Lund, N., Emoto, M., Kizu, T. (2008). Effects of distant intention on water crystal formation: A triple-blind replication. Journal of Scientific Exploration, 22(4), 481-493. Quote:
Targ, R. and Puthoff, H. (1975) “Information transfer under conditions of sensory shielding.” Nature, 251, 602-607. Last edited by Acting Like Godot; 11-21-2011 at 02:00 PM. | ||
| | |
| | #141 (permalink) | ||
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 475
| Quote:
The speed at which quantum entities affect each other across vast stretches of the universe is “instantaneous,” making something traveling at the “speed of light” appear to be standing still in comparison. Quote:
I reiterate: The quantum fabric composing the objects of the universe does not belong to you in such a way that would allow you to wield and restructure it like you can with the fabric of your own mind. You are the literal "God" of the interior substance your own personal mind, nothing else. seeds | ||
| | |
| | #142 (permalink) |
| Family Member Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,342
| Yes, it's more useful to see that there is no 'out there', which is not really confirmed by the proportion of empty space in an object. It's also useful to notice that experience follows thought, and hypnosis seems to point in that direction, as does the experience of manifestation and synchronicities.
|
| | |
| | #143 (permalink) |
| Family Member Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,342
| Not sure what previous discussions you are referring to, but I'll assume you mean the focus on manifesting your heart's desire. I don't have a problem with that, but it never set anybody free. I'm more focused on the collapse of beliefs. there is a practical approach to this, but i don't think anybody is interested in that.
|
| | |
| | #144 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,342
| Quote:
Yes, I understand how the whole 99% space deally might jar one's preconceptions a bit, I just don't see it as particularly powerful in that regard. Just my perception. | |
| | |
| | #145 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,342
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #146 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 194
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #148 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,613
|
Now I would like to elaborate on how to walk through a wall, apparition-style. First, a little more background on where and when I did this. I did this while attending the Silva Method course, where everybody had to walk through wallls. What is the Silva Method course? I would describe it as a course that teaches a combination of certain mind techniques - including ESP, LOA, RV, reiki, channelling and creative visualisation. What the course does is blend these different components into a single system with various specfic tools. You can easily google "Silva Method" or its founder "Jose Silva" to find out more. The part about walking through a wall is an expanded version of remote viewing. If you do not know what is remote viewing, click some of these links - here, here and here. Essentially, RV is about mentally projecting yourself to other places, so that you can see what's going on there. For example, you could sit on a sofa in your living room, but project yourself (or try to project) to a location thousands of miles away, to see what's happening there. (Naturally this kind of stuff has been of interest to the military and intelligence agencies, but in ordinary life, it turns out to have relatively few applications). In the Silva Method of RV, you do not merely try to "see" a place. You will instead visualise yourself being physically there. You then walk around the place and see if you can successfully gather information. Naturally, not everyone is going to be able to do this on their first try. It takes practice. To know whether you're succeeded, you would need independent corroboration. Without the benefit of scientifically controlled conditions, the only way you get your corroboration is if you have anecdotal evidence like this - -- you project yourself to a familiar place (eg your uncle's home) -- you detect something which you had not known before (eg you see that your uncle has got a new cupboard with three shelves and four drawers, on the left wall of the first bedroom on the 2nd floor. -- you call your uncle to check, and he tells you that yes, last week he just bought a new cupboard with three shelves and four drawers, and he has placed it on the left wall of the first bedroom on the 2nd floor. To stretch your confidence during the Silva Method, you are also asked to do a variety of things. For example, you are asked to visualise yourself walking through a wall and experiencing what the wall is like. You are also asked to try merging with a tree, or a coin. You will experience that merging with a wall feels different from merging with a tree or merging with a coin. But it is difficult to explain with words - it would be like explaining the taste of potatoes to someone who has not eaten them before. --------- Personally I am not a fan of RV. It is an interesting topic but it doesn't have much practical application, at least for me. It doesn't feel easy to me either. Generally you can classify the esoteric mind tools into two broad categories - the passive/receptive (where you seek to receive information) and the active/creative (where you seek to mould and create). My wife does well with the passive/receptive; I do better with the active/creative stuff. Last edited by Acting Like Godot; 11-21-2011 at 09:35 PM. |
| | |
| | #149 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 857
| Quote:
Are these telekinetic abilities so wide-spread in China? If it could be possible to use these abilities distantly over many thousands of miles... - do you know any examples? | |
| | |
| | #150 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,613
| Quote:
Let me give you a simple example. Your skin is an object of the universe. Skin also turns out to be highly susceptible to the workings of the mind. There are many studies, for instance, that show that hypnosis can be used to heal eczema and psoriasis. Your flesh is also an object of the universe. It also turns out to be highly susceptible to the workings of the mind. For example, here's a study from Harvard which shows that hypnosis can used to accelerate the healing of surgical wounds. Can medical hypnosis accelerate post-surgical... [Am J Clin Hypn. 2003] - PubMed - NCBI Actually Harvard also has research showing that thinking healing thoughts, during a hypnotic trance, helps to accelerate the healing of broken bones as well. So that's already three examples of objects in the universe - skin, flesh and bone - which can be affected by the workings of your mind. | |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| If subjective reality is true, where does objective reality come from? | Freefall | Spirituality, Consciousness, & Awareness | 7 | 04-19-2011 02:20 PM |
| Objective reality vs Subjective Reality debate | Mounds | Personal Effectiveness | 36 | 11-08-2010 01:28 PM |
| When is reality objective and when is it subjective | ar81 | Emotional Mastery | 0 | 10-15-2008 02:23 PM |
| I-M in objective and subjective reality | Frans | Intention-Manifestation | 14 | 11-19-2007 10:41 PM |
| Your current belief: Is reality subjective, partially subjective, or objective? | Erock | Spirituality, Consciousness, & Awareness | 37 | 04-10-2007 01:33 AM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:50 PM.




