| | |||||||
| Social & Relationships Social skills, friends, dating, sex, seduction, monogamy, polyamory, marriage, alternative relationships, soul mates, parenting, children, family life, education |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 124
|
I'm very interested in anything related to intelligence, and to those of you who know you have a high (i.e: 130 or higher) IQ (or at least have been regularly labelled so by your peers), I wonder how you think? How do you analyze information or situations? Are you almost always able to think quickly, solve problems quickly, understand things quickly? Do you think in a visual or abstract way? Feel free to share anything you can think of Last edited by zpivat; 02-17-2007 at 06:07 PM. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Portage la Prairie, Manitoba
Posts: 61
|
After taking a varety IQ tests, my score is anywhere from 110 to 120. However, my emotional health has held me back from learning to drive a car, and basically getting a job outside the fast food industry. I do think abstractly, which helps me with my photography and teaching myself to play mandolin (a very difficult choice, or so I hear!) When I was a child I was labeled a "slow learner", however in retrospect it was the teaching methods which were to blame. Hitting little girls with yardsticks, humiliating them, sceaming at them, etc. was the normal approach to education in the 1970s. Around puberty, I decided to read all the books that my "genius" older brothers read, then my grades improved. The corporal punishment laws were also changed. I was no longer rapped on the back with a stick for smiling "the wrong way". Anyway, high IQs only teach us one thing: People with the highest scores have amazing skills in knowing the correct answers to IQ tests. Social skills are a completely different animal. With all my neurons in my mighty brain, I still experience turmoil when it comes to making friends, networking, etc. I can't sell my art or even find any other musicians to play with because I have a disinterest/terror in meeting new people. In fact, I can be rather sacastic and hostile around unfamiliar people. I have suffered severe depression as a result of my own personality. And,I don't know how the rest of "you morons" think. You're the ones that work in nice offices and drive fancy cars and make friends where ever you go, no matter how old you are, etc. etc. Do you want fries with that?
|
| | |
| | #3 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 124
|
Yes I agree with you Deb. While having a high IQ helps us to process information better, that doesn't mean we'll be successful in life. Another equally important determinant, EQ, plays a larger role, I think...... Anyway, keep your IQ stories coming people!! |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Gainford, England
Posts: 375
|
Hard word, determination, self-discipline, confidence, conviction, passion, EQ and organisation are all far more important then IQ. IQ gives you an early start but it's up to you how you choose to apply it. Some people just let that good start slip.
|
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: IL
Posts: 83
|
I've never taken an IQ test, but I'm usually pegged as smart. I scored a 33 on my ACT and I'm running off a merit scholarship at the university I'm attending. I thought I'd throw in my few cents because I don't know my brain very well, I guess. I honestly have very little idea how it all works up there. I just know that when I'm learning things, I assimilate the information with a good success rate. I take the information I already know and match it up with the new stuff - sometimes I create patterns where they might not exist, if they help me remember things. I have a pretty intense interest in knowledge, as well, and this helps keep my memory in line. I find that I work very well with procrastination, actually. If I'm writing a paper, I'll review the material (very haphazardly - I'm not organized or very disciplined), and then not write the paper until within 24 hours of it being due. It gives my brain time to stew over the material and then clears and focuses it when I need to work. Often, with problems, I'll do the same thing. But if you mean math problems or something, I have a sort of knack for math. It's just all in my head. With understanding and learning things, I just... do. I don't know. Honestly. I don't know if I think in a visual, auditory, tactile or abstract way. I've often wondered, but it really just seems like I apply whatever works best at the moment to what I'm doing. Perhaps it's more abstract than it is anything else. I think you'd be best off getting a response from someone with a keen interest in how their brain works who has researched into the issue, taken multiple IQ tests, etc. Also, I agree with the previous posters who have emphasized that intelligence is only a component of success and happiness. Intelligence is an entirely different (albeit interesting) animal. |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,629
| Quote:
No one in my family has an IQ below 130, and some of us score significantly higher than that, with each of us being fairly eccentric. Particularly, none of the men fit into the mainstream. We have our own ways of doing things which we deem more efficient for our particular uses, and feel little need to bow to the party line. One of my prime traits is the ability to see patterns and various interrelationships very easily. When taking algebra in junior high I’d usually come up with my own formulas for doing problems, and was the only student in the class allowed to not write out the problems, as I’d been the only one who could do so and consistently be right. Instead of filling a page with 20-30 lines of work, I’d have a problem line, answer line, and check line. In foreign languages I take on native accents within a couple weeks of study. It still takes a bit of studying to learn much vocabulary though. As a senior at one of the public Ivy universities, I still haven’t developed much of anything that could be referred to as a study habit. On average my coursework may take up 15-30 minutes per day outside class. With essays I’ll usually read the assignment and then leave it alone until a day or so before it’s due, even if I’d had weeks to do it. Most 2-3 page papers can be done in 30-120 minutes, and my first 9 page essay was done in a 24 hour period, including a break for 8 hours of sleep. My papers seem to largely write themselves in my sleep, and I try to always at least take a nap before writing. I tend to be very intuitive. I can go into any class and be one of the main people contributing ideas within minutes of walking in, even if I officially know little to nothing about the subject. With most questions a professor or a test asks, it feels that the question itself has the answer within it. Around age 14 I made particular use of this, and found that even with tests such as the practice MCAT I could get virtually every question right even though I’d never studied the subject. Back then, I did the same with IQ tests and routinely maxed them out. I tend to be very open to new ideas and have no problem admitting the possibility that my views on something may be inaccurate, as my understanding of the world is continually growing. IQ isn’t everything, but nothing is Being “highly interested in anything related to intelligence”, you might enjoy Project Renaissance with Win Wenger, Ph.D. | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 586
|
I think IQ tests measure cognition very well, but not meta-cognition (which IMO is way more important). This was covered in this thread and the linked article: http://www.stevepavlina.com/forums/p...=metacognition Past a certain point, you realize that intuition/meta-cognition completely overpowers logical thinking and reasoning; it takes so much effort to concentrate on making logical steps, and it all falls apart when you make the wrong assumptions. In ideal ivory-tower problems, they give you the correct assumptions, but in the real world, almost 100% of the time your assumptions are off one way or another I think many of the people with high IQ also realize this meta-cognitive aspect -- they find their own shortcuts to everything, they "get" the essence of what a problem is about without having to "think" about it, etc. So I think instead of approaching intelligence from the point of view of traditional left-brain logic and cognition, it's more helpful to approach it from a holistic, intuitive, meta-cognitive right-brain way. |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,437
| Quote:
everyone has their one unique styles and strengths if you want to learn how to think more effectively, quicker, more thoroughly, just do brain teasers and riddles and quizzes of that sort. The key is tenacity. Every time you solve a riddle you get smarter and raise your IQ, but you have to actually solve it yourself. This is what lets you develop the thinking patterns that make someone score high on IQ tests. it really is that simple | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | ||
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 124
| Quote:
Quote:
| ||
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,437
| Quote:
it's also been shown that elderly people who play games like scrabble, do puzzles, crosswords, that sort of thing have a much lower incidence of Alzheimer's, dementia and those conditions of the brain which come with aging. Use it or lose it Chess players over time develop a sort of "chess sight" that lets them very easily visualize a chess board and go through all the potential future moves in their head. It just comes with practice, and this type of visualization skill is exactly what IQ tests measure. | |
| | |
| | #12 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: The Darkness / The Never
Posts: 1,673
|
IQ is not a driect correlation of intelligence. Its merely an imperfect way of measuring perfection (go Figure) but on various internet tests I score roughly 120-130. I don't conisder my self overly intelligent. Thats an excess of pride and irrelevant. I consider my self Philosophical though. I am a very deep thinker. Sometimes to the point where I cannot keep track of my own musings. But saying that sometimes I am a very shallow, inconsiderate thinker because I don't always stay rooted in reality to the best I can. Which is why recently I have been working on grounding myself more down to earth through exercise, reading and DOING more school work, rather than analyzing things. I couldn't imagine thinknig any other way really so I can;t really tell you HOW I think. I just DO. I think therefore I am. |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: No where
Posts: 189
|
i refused to take the IQ test. Reason is that i really don't want to know that information. If it is dissapointing it will lower my confidence and if it is bigger it will do no good except putting more pressure on my shoulders. I just want to try hard in everything i do, do my best and that is enough no matter what happens. Nikola Tesla, inventor of electricity once said that he doesn't consider himself very inteligent person. He just worked on every single thing that interested him ten times more than anybody else. In his opinion that is the key of his success. And i believe him |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) |
| Family Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,123
|
The greater IQ, the most time you spend thinking... and the less you think you know. And the more complex it gets. But to be "smart" sometimes you've got to stop thinking... somehow you've got to balance thinking and not thinking. And I think I've thought enough about it. |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Central MD
Posts: 385
|
I think that openeyes pretty much hit the nail on the head. I tend to just know the answer without really thinking about it. The approach that I take to most "real world" problems is this: Look at the problem, and take the first solution that comes to mind, and assume that it is correct. Then run through the solution in my mind and try to prove it wrong. While doing that, think of possible branches as I trace the path to my solution. If I decide that I was wrong, go back and try one of the alternate branches. If I don't have the time to do that (I generally don't spend more than 30 seconds on anything that I deem is unimportant, and usually no more than 5 minutes on something that is important), then I just assume that my first solution is correct, and take the action. In other words, I generally just trust my instincts.
|
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) | |
| Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 51
| Quote:
Intelligence is just for solving unknown situtation. For every known situation, it is better to have the best protocol (knowledge). | |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Sydney, Australia (this week)
Posts: 11
|
great question! there's a great article at the prometheus society's site called _the Outsiders_. Well worth a read: http://www.prometheussociety.org/art...Outsiders.html |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 23
|
I'd like to suggest that you might find it very interesting to attend a meeting of your local Mensa chapter. You can find it here: American Mensa | Local Groups (assuming you are in the USA). You probably know that you need an IQ in the upper 2% to join. A local member/officer would probably allow you to attend a meeting as a guest. If you enjoyed it, you could take the test to join. Seeing high IQs in action, personally, should give some real insight on your question. Brooks (Mensan) [QUOTE=zpivat;42110]I'm very interested in anything related to intelligence, and to those of you who know you have a high (i.e: 130 or higher) IQ ...QUOTE] |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 124
| Perhaps you actually do think; it's just that it's done with such a great speed that you hardly feel it? Quote:
Who is Bobby Fischer? | |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5
|
I have taken I.Q. tests/elementary school and on my own. I was surprised to find it much higher than I would have predicted. 135-142 (Not high enough to be freakish, but decent.) I can't say "how I think". I always feel I'm a bit scattered, though not enough to be considered ADD. Often, I suspect the tests were wrong and I'm functioning around educably MR. I'm now middle-aged (early 40's) and I don't put much stock in these numbers. I think social intelligence, ability to overcome fear/obstacles, and simple "drive" would have been greater gifts. It's not that I'm without any amount of these, but.... I know a man without much education at all. He didn't finish high school. He had a TERRIBLE family (beating, all manner of abuse, neglect) and he's a self-made millionaire. I happen to know his I.Q. has been measured at 115. That's one standard deviation above the norm? High normal. He began his own business after working as a truck driver. He worked like a dog and acted like he wasn't afraid of anything. He never invested in stock, but rather, bought land all over the place. So. Hmmm. |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: PA
Posts: 68
|
I don't think IQ has anything to do with the way you think. It all has to do with your particular interests. An engineer will definitely approach any problem differently than an artist or an author. So it really has to do with your training in any particular area. As you can see an engineer will have problems expressing himself but its much easier for an artist or author. It's just which side of the brain you're used to using regularly.
|
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Dunedin, New Zealand
Posts: 194
|
My IQ was tested 128-132. I think my youngest brother is the whizzz but he's got an average of 133 to 135. I reckon he's far more clever then I am. Brilliant in IT etc. My eldest brother is an intensive care specialist. Good on them but so what? I'm very visual as I'm an artist and interior stylist (no academic stuff for me, just a bachelor in fine arts). But heck who cares? Do what you like to do best if you can. It's more important how you treat others I reckon. Brain or not much brain. I think my grey matter gets slower if I stop learning as in studying. I've picked it up again recently and it seems less foggy up there |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 154
| Quote:
I did learn to read and write at four, and I was always enthusiastic about learning as a kid, but since then have shown nothing special academically. I'm in a very prestigous engineering program right now, but am having a hard time just passing my classes. I think in a scattered manner most of the time. Usually, I'm just daydreaming. Not a good thing for engineering. As for talents, I have an internal BS detector that can sense flaws in a person's argument pretty easily. Usually, I find that people are partially right in their opinions but make key mistakes in their assumptions. I wouldn't even consider this a talent, except that so few people seem to have this. Just look at politics to see what I mean. Also, any time I do something, my brain will replay it over and over again. Especially if my unconscious senses that I did something incorrectly. If I did do something wrong, it'll eventually come to me. Or, if I'm anticipating something in the future, my brain will automatically play out every possible scenario that it can think of. And finally, if I'm faced with a problem that I care about, I'll just obsess over it until ideas come to me. Do the rest of you have these traits? And something that disturbs me is that I really have no concrete idea as to what intelligence is and what IQ tests mean. Last edited by mattsonn; 02-27-2007 at 03:10 AM. | |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 154
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) | ||
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 124
| Quote:
Quote:
- I'm in general a very safe driver and never drive more than 5 km/h above the posted speed limit. Freeway scares me, as do bad drivers. So whenever I drive and do mistakes, or have some people do mistakes to me, I'd play the scene over and over and over in my head, to make sure next time it won't happen again, to make sure I can handle things better, etc. Sometimes it gets really annoying, because then I'd play these scenes just before sleep, at the bed. And these scenes could be something that happened like, weeks ago..... *sigh* - I hate yellow lights, because whenever I see them, it always makes me nervous because it can mean "stop" or it can mean "go", and sometimes there's a fine line between the two. The thing is, I know that I must avoid getting rear ended, must avoid colliding with the driver from the opposite side who is about to turn left, who may mistakenly think that I'd stop just because it's yellow, must make sure that I don't screech, especially during winters (in fact, I very often hear screeches done by other drivers, so I guess other people have the same issue as me), etc. I'm sure you drivers know about it. So what did I do? I coincidentally live on a high condominium, and I could see traffic lights from my livingroom very easily. I took a binocular, and took the average number of seconds of the yellow light duration, and came up with 4 seconds. Then I did all kinds of physical and mathematical calculations, to figure out the save stopping distance, to figure out how much distance (I think I came up with 50 m) that can be covered in 4 seconds (no, actually I reduced it to 3 to accommodate for a safety cushion) by the speed that I usually go at (60 km/h). I then opened Google Earth and measured how much 50 m really is from the stop line (well I am kind of bad at judging distance, and it's really hard to judge how 50 m looks like from the stopping distance, seen from a 20th floor building), etc............. Or......may be I'm just plain stupid afterall | ||
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: D.C. area
Posts: 278
|
I'm not sure if I go in for all this high IQ stuff. It just seems like a way for academic types to feel good about themselves. There are all different types of intelligence and different ways to measure it. Even trying to measure something we understand so poorly feels a bit pretentious. I think you should read Asimov, "What is Intelligence?". It will definitely change the way you think about intelligence. |
| | |
| | #28 (permalink) |
| Junior Member Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: California
Posts: 9
|
My IQ has been measured at 160. I think that I'm good at taking tests... :-) I joined MENSA out of curiosity, and observed that the members appeared to be no more uniform in their thought patterns or methods than any other group of people I'd known. A common trait in the group was the love of puns, but I don't make any conclusions from this. Many members in the group were engineers and "computer types," which is what one might expect in the SF Bay Area (Silicon Valley being a part of that area). My daughter's IQ is probably higher than my own. Although we are remarkably similar in many ways, I must say that she amazes me every time I talk to her. The older I get, the more I value common sense, which certainly does not always correlate to high IQ. |
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Singapore
Posts: 433
|
Robert Dilts, one of the foremost developers of NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming), has done some interesting research into genius and created mental models of genius that anyone can learn to apply. If you can find them, his Strategies of Genius Volume 1 (Aristole, Sherlock Holmes, Walt Disney, Mozart), Volume 2 (Albert Einstein) and Volume 3 (Nikola Tesla, Leonardo DaVinci, Sigmund Freud) are insightful reads. Also check out his interview on Genius and the Generative Self. |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Do you hate rich people? | alexb5784 | Intention-Manifestation | 76 | 08-28-2010 10:46 PM |
| Alcohol | Totga | Emotional Mastery | 53 | 06-05-2009 04:03 AM |
| The Science of Success. | craigharper.com | Personal Effectiveness | 11 | 10-03-2007 01:38 PM |
| Gaining Effortless Leadership Possible? | birdmanx35 | Character & Contribution | 18 | 04-08-2007 11:19 PM |
| Smart People | elainevdw | Steve Pavlina | 19 | 01-23-2007 06:54 PM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:28 PM.




