|12-19-2011, 04:57 PM||#1 (permalink)|
Join Date: Nov 2010
In conversations with God, Neale talks about the idea that being absolutely certain about the outcome will manifest the goal. And at the same time he says that there are no guarantees in life. Do you see this as a discrepancy.
Also in Sedona Method, Hale Dwoskin says that in order to manifest, you have to not care about the outcome, whether or not it will manifest.
Which side do you take?
|12-20-2011, 04:30 AM||#2 (permalink)|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Down the infinite rabbit hole
These don't conflict.
Being absolutely certain that something is going to happen doesn't mean you have to be attached to that. There just comes a point where you know that there is no other possibility, that there can be no other outcome. Once you're at that point, you can stop fretting about it, and stop worrying about it, because you know.
It looks like a paradox at first, yes, but when you experience it, you find that it's not a paradox at all.
All times are GMT. The time now is 09:26 PM.