Can you really do, be, or have anything you want?

[arpee]

I mean, what about children that believes that super heroes exist and they want to be like a super hero with powers and stuff?

What about a person who believe in levitation so they jump off of a building with "faith" that they could do it?

Or what about God's plan? Are you really that powerful that you can create everything in your own reality?

I know they say that you can't create in other's reality but you can influence, I wonder, what happens if two people want one thing and there is only one of it? Probably the one with the most "faith" wins and gets it?

I can't create in another's reality but what if it's something that link our realities? Can I control it? If I don't like a president is it all up to ME to visualize and feel and have faith that the one I want will get elected?

[Reefs]

The answer is yes, yess, yesss, yessss!!!

[VinceG]

You're asking some pretty good questions. I'll go through them one by one.

Originally Posted by arpee

I mean, what about children that believes that super heroes exist and they want to be like a super hero with powers and stuff?

What happens in this case is children explore this reality through the dream world and natural OBE. The real world cannot handle their fantasies, so they explore them in a reality that can.

What about a person who believe in levitation so they jump off of a building with "faith" that they could do it?

I've not heard of someone whose ever done that. The problem with these hypothetical desires is that the people you imagine having them aren't real people.

Or what about God's plan? Are you really that powerful that you can create everything in your own reality?

You have a mind and that can create experiences that are even more powerful than reality. You can create sex with supermodels in your head and that sex would be far better than real sex with the real deal ever would.

I know they say that you can't create in other's reality but you can influence, I wonder, what happens if two people want one thing and there is only one of it? Probably the one with the most "faith" wins and gets it?

You can create other people's reality. The easiest example to point to here is the job world. Your boss can easily create the reality of you being fired. You can hash out the followup questions pretty easily there. Yes, faith plays a role. You could try coming back in the next day and working like you weren't fired, but they'd probably call the police on you.

I can't create in another's reality but what if it's something that link our realities? Can I control it? If I don't like a president is it all up to ME to visualize and feel and have faith that the one I want will get elected?

The problem with affecting elections is, you'd be throwing your reality creation skills up against a whole bunch of other people who are perfectly capable of creating reality themselves.

That said, there's lots of time lines, and with skillful manipulation/manifesting, you could bring your consciousness into a time line where your desired outcome happens. That may or may not be feasible in all instances. And without a way to reliably determine, you won't know what's what. You may not get the reality you choose because there was zero chance of it happening. For giant events like elections, that becomes more likely.

[Reefs]

Originally Posted by VinceG

The problem with affecting elections is, you'd be throwing your reality creation skills up against a whole bunch of other people who are perfectly capable of creating reality themselves.

That said, there's lots of time lines, and with skillful manipulation/manifesting, you could bring your consciousness into a time line where your desired outcome happens. That may or may not be feasible in all instances. And without a way to reliably determine, you won't know what's what. You may not get the reality you choose because there was zero chance of it happening. For giant events like elections, that becomes more likely.

Meddling with elections in a manipulative sense is OTV behavior, therefore not powerful and effective. May bring results but they won't last.

If you would just follow your own nose you would be very powerful and your actions very effective. And when others get a whiff of what's going in your world and want the same then elections can be influenced as a side effect.

So, influencing elections as a goal, no. Influencing elections as a side effect, yes.

[VinceG]

Originally Posted by Reefs

Meddling with elections in a manipulative sense is OTV behavior, therefore not powerful and effective. May bring results but they won't last.

If you would just follow your own nose you would be very powerful and your actions very effective. And when others get a whiff of what's going in your world and want the same then elections can be influenced as a side effect.

So, influencing elections as a goal, no. Influencing elections as a side effect, yes.

Politics can get even enlightened people killed. Socrates, Jesus, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr.

[Reefs]

Originally Posted by VinceG

Politics can get even enlightened people killed. Socrates, Jesus, Gandhi, Martin Luther King, Jr.

Yeah, better let the Universal Manager do the dirty work.

[Acting Like Godot]

I don't think you can have everything you want, because thoughts are very tricky stuff and they often conflict with each other and you may not even recognise this easily.

[arpee]

But, if you can just switch to a time line where your desire happens, how is it possible that someone else can create in your reality?


Like if I wanted to be with Bob, then if Bob doesn't like me in this time line can't I just shift to another time line where Bob does like me?

If this is possible, then why is it that some people don't have what they desire? Because they can have it all by just switching to a new time line?

[Reefs]

Originally Posted by arpee

But, if you can just switch to a time line where your desire happens, how is it possible that someone else can create in your reality?


Like if I wanted to be with Bob, then if Bob doesn't like me in this time line can't I just shift to another time line where Bob does like me?

If this is possible, then why is it that some people don't have what they desire? Because they can have it all by just switching to a new time line?

No timelines, arpee. For you there is only one timeline and that is where your current focus is.

[arpee]

Originally Posted by Reefs

No timelines, arpee. For you there is only one timeline and that is where your current focus is.

So, if there are no timelines that you can switch to, then that means that only one thing can possibly happen.

[Reefs]

Originally Posted by arpee

So, if there are no timelines that you can switch to, then that means that only one thing can possibly happen.

Well, if you think that your creations have a life of their own then I can see how the idea of timelines looks very promising.

But from your personal point of view, when you are gone, your creations are also gone. The moment you cease to exist your creations cease to exist also. Your creations don't have a life of their own, therefore no timelines.

[arpee]

Originally Posted by Reefs

Well, if you think that your creations have a life of their own then I can see how the idea of timelines looks very promising.

But from your personal point of view, when you are gone, your creations are also gone. The moment you cease to exist your creations cease to exist also. Your creations don't have a life of their own, therefore no timelines.

Are you saying that I'm the only creator and no one else is creating? If I wanted to create a reality where I am with a specific person, they have no say in the matter?

[Reefs]

Originally Posted by arpee

Are you saying that I'm the only creator and no one else is creating? If I wanted to create a reality where I am with a specific person, they have no say in the matter?

Your universe starts and ends with you. That others that are part of your universe are also creators is an assumption only. They are objects only. Objects don't have a life of their own.