| | |||||||
| Intention-Manifestation Manifesting intentions, law of attraction, vibrational harmony, synchronicities, luck, share your intentions, practice group manifesting |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: In the moment
Posts: 527
|
Makers of the Secret and Abraham have no documented prosperity before their teachings. Why do we continue to follow their claims? Aren't other people seeing a problem here?
Last edited by billionairekid; 04-15-2011 at 08:16 PM. |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Davis, California
Posts: 378
|
...what difference would that make? just because they "teach" this stuff does not imply that they can actually practice and how many people actually practice this and never go on lecture tours or sell DVD's and books?!! Understand this - mental magic is as old as the hills, people used self-hypnosis, positive thinking and mentaliststic approaches to well being, healing etc, long before any religion, Abraham or self-help forums ever existed. Actually, the few people, who are really good at this stuff, never tell a soul! Why should they? |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Location: parallel to something adjacent
Posts: 89
|
I think (maybe) that Hicks channelled Abraham in the beginning, but for years it's been fake... They still have some good advice though, take from it what you can, and follow your own path. LOA works, I know this... Don't get hung up on Abraham, and be sure to stop worrying about this. Cast it aside and move on. Abraham do help people, so they aren't that bad, it's best to just leave them to it.
|
| | |
| | #5 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 33
|
From what I understood, Jerry Hicks made a fortune before he met Esther and she started channeling Abraham. He attributed his early success to applying what he learned in "Think and Grow Rich" by Napoleon Hill. Regardless of whether it is true or not, it is a logical fallacy to say that a teaching is false because a specific teacher is unable to apply the teaching for claimed results. Along the same lines, just because a specific teacher is enormously successful with a specific teaching doesn't mean that what they teach is true either. Both are logically false because they attempt to prove/disprove a theory by focusing on the person rather than on the theory itself. You have to prove/disprove the theory. (Or if it isn't provable then it's a matter of whether the theory resonates or is useful to the individual in making their lives better.) |
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) | |
| Member Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 87
| Quote:
There is no problem. | |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: In the moment
Posts: 527
|
I fully believe in the art of manifestation. I've used it many times in my life for different things. The one area I've had lots of trouble with is wealth. And I have a problem with people teaching you how to get "rich" using a formula they've never applied. Metaphysics has been around for many many years and there are many people who have undoubtedly used it to manifest wealth. I get frustrated hearing these "teachers" whom have yet to prove they can do it for themselves. And it's not that I want validation manifestation works because as I said, I know it does. I'm a logical person so if what they teach does work, why do they have to keep selling products telling us the same things over and over. I guess I could be part of the problem lol considering I've bought many of Abraham's products. They contain great information but as far as practicallity goes, I'm undecided. I'll take my frustrations and channel them into my practice. Maybe it's my desires that are causing the trouble. I want to break free from the traditional need to have a job in order to make money. And I have not been able to do yet |
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,273
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 232
| Quote:
Last edited by Bluth; 04-20-2011 at 08:45 AM. | |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) |
| Family Member Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,273
| That should NOT be a factor in her writing a great book that received much acclaim! She deserves alot of credit for that book! Only posting about her misfortunate demise is very insulting.... I would think it's better to post about something else!
|
| | |
| | #11 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 232
| Quote:
I do look forward to read her book. | |
| | |
| | #13 (permalink) | |
| Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: In a house
Posts: 81
| Quote:
and the more scalable and leverage you can utilize in that business, the better the business model is. If that secret is about money, happiness, health, etc... people will line up in droves to hear it. | |
| | |
| | #14 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: United Kingdom :)
Posts: 1,735
| Quote:
Unless you dont really have the money, but then the information can be found freely online anyways. Plus, ive read the secret, and the power. And the information in there could be used to successfully work with the LOA. But there has to be some element of dedication. Even magick works like that. | |
| | |
| | #15 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12,690
| Quote:
That's a marketing idea, put there in yer head by those who want to market their products to you. You see it all the time online.... Person 1: "What? you are charging [some ridiculous amount of money] for your product? Are you insane????" Marketeer: "Well, you see, the amount of money you put in my pocket is a direct litmus of how dedicated you are. So, you see, if you don't put money in my pocket, then you obviously are not dedicated to change." Person 1: "Um, no. $997 for one hour of your time is not a reasonable transaction." | |
| | |
| | #16 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: United Kingdom :)
Posts: 1,735
| Quote:
*shrugs* | |
| | |
| | #17 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12,690
| Quote:
Another marketing ploy. Nah, I understand what you're saying (I really do). I get that point. But the meaning is only there if you make that mean that. And trust me, those who sell PD products want you to make that association. I have a little different idea about it. I'm very willing to pay the money for the product if I can be reasonably sure that the product is going to deliver value. But here's the thing...just because someone *says* that the money you put into their program will reap dividends does not ultimately mean that their product will deliver the value. I'm spent money on personal development books that I literally wanted to hurl across the room and storm the author's headquarters and demand my money back. Conversely, I've gotten *free* products that made me want to dip into my pocket and just give the person every last penny I had. Be careful making the association that the amount of money you invest into a product is going to be a good gauge of the value you are going to get out of it. | |
| | |
| | #18 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: United Kingdom :)
Posts: 1,735
| Quote:
Seems foolish. Of course, if there asking you to pay with your arms and legs. Back away. | |
| | |
| | #19 (permalink) | |
| Banned Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 12,690
| Quote:
But, then again, that really depends on what the product is. For example, I was on a forum where you had to pay to have an avatar. And, eventually, you had to pay to get into the main forum. And the owner's reasoning was that because he said like 4 years ago (at the time) that he'd never put ads up on the sight, that's why he was doing it. And I thought, ummm, well, you're pissing a lot more people off by making them pay to use your forum than you would be if you just put some ads up. And it was this MASSIVE message board where he had all kinds of traffic. And he tried to say that his hosting costs were getting too much for him to handle. In other words, he was casting the onus of the blame onto the user ("there's too many of you!") rather than monetizing his traffic in a way that would be sustainable. In that case, yes, it's ridiculous to pay for something that is pretty much free everywhere else. | |
| | |
| | #20 (permalink) | ||
| Senior Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: In the moment
Posts: 527
| Quote:
However, I'm ready for the next level and I've been experimenting on my own to figure out what that is. Hopefully Mrs. Grabhorn can help me get there Quote:
@James - I wanna say one more time how bright you are. I greatly appreciate reading your posts and I think you're an enlightening member of this forum. | ||
| | |
| | #21 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Northern California
Posts: 325
|
I think there are people out there, selling products like these, to make money and they basically have little to no idea what they are talking about. They are just taking advantage of people. So it's good to have a discerning eye I suppose. I am not a fan of the Hicks people or the secret or any of that. Reminds me of Fast Food spirituality, prepackaged, and more concerned on the mass quantity of sales, rather than the quality of the work. |
| | |
| | #22 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 443
|
It's not the teachings that are bad. The overall principle is what works, but when you get deep into their teachings about talking to higher beings and stuff like that, I don't exactly get all of that. They basically stole things you could get out of numerous books already written. They certainly made a lot of money in the end. |
| | |
| | #23 (permalink) | |
| Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: In a house
Posts: 81
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #24 (permalink) |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 581
|
It's a little bit of skeptics-paradox. if they have a lot of money, we say "they are lying and they only do it to make money", but if they would be poor we'd say "why they want to teach me how to be rich when they are broke as ****" since the theory they teach is available for free (or for a few dollars in the form of books), you can't lose much. Really, the theory of the law of attraction is a more-or-less simple theory, and it is available for free online. the content of the secret is basically available for free. you can download it from torrent, and then pay if you feel like it's worth the price. Last edited by MacFly; 04-21-2011 at 07:16 PM. |
| | |
| | #25 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Uranus (no, not yours ;) )
Posts: 30
|
Want to get to the next level? You have to change your subconscious beliefs. You can ALWAYS tell what your subconscious beliefs are by the results you are getting in your life. There is NEVER an exception. Hypnosis is decent. NLP is even better. EFT (Emotional Freedome Technique) is even better. Faster EFT is better yet (visit Faster EFT.com - The official website of Robert G. Smith, creator of FasterEFT ) he'll let you know how to use his technique for absolutely free. Information is very important and it's kind of like which came first? The rooster or the hen? Wait, different story. I hope that helps and makes sense? Best wishes on your journey. |
| | |
| | #26 (permalink) |
| Family Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Barleylands, United Kingdom
Posts: 1,257
|
I don't really understand the logic of the question in original post. I mean, I get what you're trying to say, but it makes no sense whatsoever from LoA perspective, at least in my eyes. I assume that people who weren't wealthy before starting to teach about LoA made an intention to become wealthy and applied their knowledge of deliberate creation to manifest wealth. They probably got an idea to start teaching people about deliberate creation. They followed that idea and now they're wealthy. The fact that they're wealthy now is a clear proof that what they're teaching works, isn't it? They made an intention to become wealthy and wealth came to them in the most efficient way possible: they've utilized their knowledge and skills that are most valuable to other people. I don't really understand how that discredits them or their teachings? |
| | |
| | #27 (permalink) |
| Family Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 2,700
|
People also tend to overlook the fact that many people can live quite comfortably getting exactly what they need as they need it and never stock piling excess. Truthfully if you observe nature this is exactly how it plays out as well. Harmoniously flowing with life isn't going to mean that you get far more than you need. It will mean that you have access to what you need when you need it. Anything more and you're just struggling with fear and convincing yourself that lack is just around the corner.
|
| | |
| | #28 (permalink) | ||
| Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 88
| Quote:
She used the Law of Attraction (along with the rest of her camera crew) to attract the masters of this information into her movie to be filmed and documented. Furthermore, she went to attract happiness, wealth, and abundance into her life afterwards as a result of using the secret and went from struggling over money problems to being financially free. Looking into the back story of this will prove the information to be valid. Quote:
Now, many people may purchase a program and then go through it once (at most), but if they want to change their results, they must repeatedly feed their mind with this new, positive information, and if they fail to go through one program many times, they can help ingrain the information from learning from multiple programs. That being said, some people learn better in certain forms than others. An eBook may appeal to someone while a video may appeal to another individual. It all comes down to a matter of preference and what helps them. Another reason is that certain products have different focuses. While they all may deal in the realm of self-help and personal development, some may touch on different topics or different aspects that aren't covered in other programs. Ultimately, what it comes down to is the result for the end user. If the creator of any such products -- one or many; different or the same in premise -- positively affects one other individual, then they've done their job correctly (and made an income through providing and selling multiple products in the process, which is a nice added benefit). | ||
| | |
| | #29 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Western USA
Posts: 274
| Quote:
I think you could figure out a way to be of service, without necessarily having to have a "job." However, according to Hannel, you will always have to have output to receive input because the law of abundance seeks to restore balance. Outflow provides inflow. What do you propose to do to provide service to others? The more you provide, the more you get, and the more you can demand of the universe in an ever-upward spiral. One should be careful with generalities. What is "rich" to you? What is "making it" to you? Hundred-thousandaires often do not consider themselves "rich," though politicians will demogogue to the masses that they are the "rich." Millionaires may not even consider themselves rich. Whether one has "made it" or is "rich" is all in the eye of the beholder. Finally, from my perspective, Esther and Jerry Hicks provide a great service to mankind, for which they are handsomely rewarded according to Hannel's Law of Attraction (service to others provides wealth). | |
| | |
| | #30 (permalink) | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 626
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
| | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Weird dream, money, money, money... | SarahLuvzYu | Fun & Recreation | 3 | 03-09-2011 12:27 AM |
| Is sex and anger related? | lifeforce | Spirituality, Consciousness, & Awareness | 2 | 12-17-2010 09:45 AM |
| Money, money, money, money, abundance, money, money, money, money, money! | nicbrahms | Intention-Manifestation | 54 | 06-22-2010 02:25 AM |
| I have a tax related question... | James81 | Business & Financial | 1 | 04-28-2009 10:54 AM |
| Leading Others, Money Related Too | straysweeper | Social & Relationships | 2 | 01-10-2009 12:15 PM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 03:02 AM.




