PATHS - Unbelievable Results

[One]

Originally Posted by One

*Physics in universities across the world is fatally flawed and you've come to an understanding of this field that will revolution the world.

*You have created devices that shred modern physics textbooks (and subsequently the modern field of physics)

*You have technology (or the science to create it) that will solve the world's energy problems.

*You have discovered the universal language of the subconscious.

Thanks for clearing up my questions Aaron. There's one more thing I'm confused about. Why don't you submit a paper to a physics journal and share your knowledge with the world? Wouldn't this do a much greater good in the world than subliminal self help? Especially considering the vast and possibly irreversible damage being done to our environment by carbon based fuels. Even if the physicists couldn't understand your paper there's no way they could argue with the experimental results they'd get from creating your machines.

[One]

Originally Posted by dor

and just imagine, some people are skeptical! and...cynics that they are, ask for evidence!

I just wanted to confirm the scope of this technology. There are many thousands of brilliant physicists in the world.

Perhaps someone would care to ask one of them to participate, as the technical jargon is far over my head.

Physics Graduate Activities and Council

John Venables, Dept of Physics, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona

[Dan.Linehan]

Originally Posted by wolfgang

I think many PATH supporters were just googling along and Steve's forum shows up and they want others to talk to about it. Instead you are assuming any new memeber that just posts in a PATHs thread is in cahoots as a marketer of PATHs.

Nah, most of them seem to be from this forum, not from google.

I'm so sorry but I couldn't help myself....As I was reading those posts by this "human" I set an intention that the fleas of a thousand camels will infest his or her armpits...... I KNOW....What a Terrible thing for me to do! And...I know you know that when I set an intention with passion, it manifests immediately.... Now there is NO doubt in my mind that this person is doing some Major Itching and I'm sure it is not pleasant at all..... I will attempt to rectify this unfortunate situation a bit later when I have calmed down...I would do it Now, but I don't think I have enough passion in my heart for it to manifest immediately, so I am afraid this person will be spending most of the day scratching away.... ; )

I'm with Pamela Sweda, infest the bugger with fleas. Then he'll be crying to Aaron to create a flea extermination module. If he wrote "pods, er modules" one more time, I was going to scream. But I'm so much calmer now from PATHS, that I just had to shake my head and hope that he goes away.

...regarding the intention I set about the fleas of one thousand camels infesting that, that, that.....er "human's" armpits..... I am afraid I must tell you, my Dearest Ones, that I simply cannot, for the moment, rectify that VERY NAUGHTY intention.....In fact....I have gone and added even more NAUGHTY intentions and somehow, I do believe that Source is applauding me for them.... We must keep in mind that Source has a Most Delightful sense of humor and My Naughty intentions are not THAT bad..... But if they are...well, my Darlings....This time I really don't mind if they come back to bite me in my very firm and well-shaped butt....

[One]

...regarding the intention I set about the fleas of one thousand camels infesting that, that, that.....er "human's" armpits..... I am afraid I must tell you, my Dearest Ones, that I simply cannot, for the moment, rectify that VERY NAUGHTY intention.....In fact....I have gone and added even more NAUGHTY intentions and somehow, I do believe that Source is applauding me for them.... We must keep in mind that Source has a Most Delightful sense of humor and My Naughty intentions are not THAT bad..... But if they are...well, my Darlings....This time I really don't mind if they come back to bite me in my very firm and well-shaped butt....

That psychology is just a little frightening. I understand calling down evil on your enemies is out of vogue these days.

[Aaron]

Hi all,

I'll start with a few quotes to think about and I'll follow up with more...

“The first philosophy (Metaphysics) is universal and is exclusively concerned with primary substance”… – Aristotle (340BC)

“…It finally turns out that one can, after all, not get along without metaphysics.” – Albert Einstein (Remarks on Bertrand Russell's Theory of Knowledge)

“The Great One produces the two poles, which in turn give rise to the energies of the dark (yin) and the light (yang). These two energies then transform themselves, one rising upwards, and the other descending downwards; they merge again and give rise to form.” – Book 5, Chapter 2 from Lu-sih ch'un-ch'iu (Spring and Autumn Annals)

To understand thoughts, the mind and its consciousness, it is important in my opinion to understand the substance of which the mind is made of. I use the term the Aether.

There was a flawed Michelson-Morlay experiment about a hundred years ago that "disproved" a material (with mass) aether but it didn't disprove anything since the experiment was flawed. It has been replicated and it showed there IS an aether. I will post references later. The aether I refer to is a massless aether composed of a "virtual photon flux of the quantum mechanical vacuum".

1957 Lee and Yang were given the Nobel prize in physics for particle symmetry. In 1959 it was experimentally proven. Basically meaning that a particle has a counter or anti-particle companion. One is going forward in time and the other is going backward in time in the opposite direction at the same time. You can move one particle and its counter particle will move and it doesn't matter what the distance is.

Vacuum doesn't mean a container with air sucked out or a device to pull dirt off the floor. Vacuum space literally is all time and space. You can be sitting in your chair reading this now and you are in vacuum space....all x,y,z axis (3 dimensions) with time "flowing" is vacuum space so you are in a vacuum. There is a debate...or an opinion dealing with semantics that it should be called a Plenum since it isn't empty but full of infinite potential.

People look at the universe and see almost all dark and very little light but the reverse is true. In all space and especially away from mass, it is filled with potential...infinite potential. With an atmosphere (gases) or not, there is always this potential. "Virtual photons" are popping in and out of our dimension at ridiculous speeds...once they pop in, they instantly pop out so are referred to as only being virtually here and therefore "virtual photons" or unobservable photons, which has the potential to become observable and do real work in this dimension.

There are positive virtual photons doing this as well as their counter anti-photon time reversed companions also fluxing in and out. In one cubic centimeter of space, there is more unorganized virtual photon potential than all the mass in the known universe combined.

We are submerged, every fiber of our being is, in this aether just like a fish is in water. This is the source of all potential as it is, literally, potential.

Many think the universe is filled with energy but this is not true. There isn't much energy in the universe, however, it is filled with potential. Basically, there is no such thing as energy, it doesn't exist as a thing. Truly energy is an adjective to describe an event. That event is when potential moves from one potential to another, from high to low OR, and yes it can, move from a low to a high potential as happens in nature all the time...will discuss this later...when one of these events happens, one can say that is energy as one can point to a car going down the street and say that it is moving. But the moving is not what the car is, it is what the car does.

The dictionary says energy is the capacity to do work. Capacity is a potential to do something. The dictionary says energy is potential and this is a contradiction so don't get caught up in ridiculous bogus dictionary definitions, which most dictionary companies are owned by multi-national corporations who have been eroding accurate meanings based on the root origins of the words for decades.

I do respect education and academia but believe it is more suited for those who have a passion for the pursuit of scholarly knowlege but of course not to be successful in the world. People with degrees in physics are only learning a sliver of the truth however. Much of what I'm going to share is really in the realm of time-energy physics. How many physicists in the world are knowlegable about time-energy physics? You can probably count them on your fingers on your two hands if even that many. Most of the people actually applying this knowlege getting results are not physicists. It is well known that most of the people who are the top in the world in their own fields either never went to college and/or are just plain self taught.

Bill Gates dropout and you all know the story.
Ted Turner, clown who used to dress his dog in a raincoat and interview him on the news channel he worked out, now look at him.
Albert Einstein even said that education is what he received AFTER he got out of school.

It has been well known that traditional status quo academia holds people back, gives them limited knowlege so as to not be able to compete in any real sense with those who are in positions of power and control and the same applies to physics where people are led to believe we are in a universe that is lacking and we are running out of resources instead of being taught the truth that were are sitting in infinite potential and there is plenty of abundance. If people were taught that, it wouldn't justify consumable "energy" sources like oil, etc...

Anyway, the "virtual photon flux of the quantum mechanical vacuum" is a term or technical jargon in quantum physics and now it isn't jargon anymore because virtual photons, flux and vacuum have been defined. it is the substance of the mind, intention, is responsible for LOA working as a matter of fact, it supplies source charge potential to light a bulb when you connect it to a battery, it is responsible for "thought forms", etc...

I'll leave this for now...how does PATHS fit in? I'll do it in baby steps but it really comes down to the subconscious mind utilizing more potential per thought per unit of time to really get results.

The next logical step from undestanding the aether is how is it tapped by batteries, generators, every cell in the body, every nerve ending to supply potential for electrical actions in the nervous system and brain, how are thoughts tapping it, etc... it requires a DIPOLE, which I'll get into next.

Is this so far even of interest to anyone here? I have no interest in what the dynamic duo have to say.

[Aaron]

Originally Posted by One

Thanks for clearing up my questions Aaron. There's one more thing I'm confused about. Why don't you submit a paper to a physics journal and share your knowledge with the world? Wouldn't this do a much greater good in the world than subliminal self help? Especially considering the vast and possibly irreversible damage being done to our environment by carbon based fuels. Even if the physicists couldn't understand your paper there's no way they could argue with the experimental results they'd get from creating your machines.

Hi One,

Virtually every component of what I'm involved in is already published.

Any technology that threatens a consumable pharmaceutical empire and/or oil consumable is not welcome. This isn't conspiracy theory, this is just plain business on their part that they want their goods to be used up over and over and over by as many people as possible and they will go to every extreme to eliminate anyone fooling with their income stream.

I have a battery charger and I can get more joules in actual work from the batteries I charge compared to joules of work that I put into it to charge them. No, this isn't over 100% efficient. Yes, it is over 1.0 COP. No, this doesn't violate any laws of physics. Yes, it is fully permittable by nonequilibrium thermodynamics as every natural system in the universe is an open nonequilibrium system. I will explain this later and it will almost be common sense to anyone who read it because it is so simple to do. Just about everyone already has something in their home that is governed by these open system principles and don't even know it.

I'll get into this later.

p.s. for a greater good, PATHs has the potential, no pun intended, to revolutionize, education, medicine and many fields at once. On the energy technology side, yes, there are many technologies that are coming out and I will point to them, I'll even post schematics and will give very clear simple explanations of the workings of them that will take away the mystery that has surrounded these technologies. Also, please don't think you need a physicist to explain this to you unless you want to learn it in their technical jargon. The point I want to make is that I actually have a desire to empower people by letting them see the CONCEPTS visually in their mind with very simple analogies so that it will be easy to understand. When made simple like this, people truly are empowered as they can put a finger on things that have evaded them for lifetimes.

[kinerkid]

Hey Aaron,

I'm with you so far... and enjoying the tutorial.

Thanks!

[One]

Originally Posted by Aaron

Hi One,

Virtually every component of what I'm involved in is already published.

Any technology that threatens a consumable pharmaceutical empire and/or oil consumable is not welcome. This isn't conspiracy theory, this is just plain business on their part that they want their goods to be used up over and over and over by as many people as possible and they will go to every extreme to eliminate anyone fooling with their income stream.

I have a battery charger and I can get more joules in actual work from the batteries I charge compared to joules of work that I put into it to charge them. No, this isn't over 100% efficient. Yes, it is over 1.0 COP. No, this doesn't violate any laws of physics. Yes, it is fully permittable by nonequilibrium thermodynamics as every natural system in the universe is an open nonequilibrium system. I will explain this later and it will almost be common sense to anyone who read it because it is so simple to do. Just about everyone already has something in their home that is governed by these open system principles and don't even know it.

I'll get into this later.

Thanks Aaron. I don't mean components, I mean fully working systems. Is the universal translator published? I'd love to read more about these technologies. Can you link me to any journal articles dealing with the full implications? That'd be great.

[The Coronet]

Originally Posted by Aaron

Hi all,

Is this so far even of interest to anyone here? I have no interest in what the dynamic duo have to say.

Very interested, please keep it coming and thanks for taking the time to explain.

[kinerkid]

Hey Dan,

Thanks for the link to that other forum. Here are some more quotes from that same page: (sorry- I'm not sure how to put them in the cool quote brackets you did!)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Hi kids,

Sorry I missed the party, I've been pretty much offline and in transit, but I love the sound of the cute dresses, fine champagne and hot cars . Count me in for the next one . I'll let you youngsters sit next to the cutie-patootie Keith . I'll chaperone .

Seriously though...just read that thread and I have to say, (Aaron are you listening?) how deeply impressed I am with Aaron, what wonderful, clear, patient, gracious, helpful responses. His integrity and passion and brilliance shines through in every sentence. Good stuff, young man!

Oh My Dear Aaron...

I just finished reading the latest editions on that thread! Phew, you are a wonderfully gracious man to have responded with as much dignity as you did! That poster was so un-enlightened about so many things, truly uninformed and so vocal with it LOL! I loved your explanation of MLM and affiliate programs.

Thank you, Aaron, for taking so much time to answer all the questions over and over. You are such a gem!

Just caught up on the latests posts over there and I'm just amazed at how patient, kind, informative and respectful Aaron remains through the whole thing. And Pamela and Grace's posts were just beautiful.

I'm with Pamela Sweda, infest the bugger with fleas. Then he'll be crying to Aaron to create a flea extermination module. If he wrote "pods, er modules" one more time, I was going to scream. But I'm so much calmer now from PATHS, that I just had to shake my head and hope that he goes away.
Love & Blessings!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Anyway, I think the flea quotes were meant out of good humor and some frustration.

[Dan.Linehan]

Hi Kinerkid,

Thanks, I appreciate you keeping it constructive, it's really all we ask.

[Aaron]

Originally Posted by One

Thanks Aaron. I don't mean components, I mean fully working systems. Is the universal translator published? I'd love to read more about these technologies. Can you link me to any journal articles dealing with the full implications? That'd be great.

Hi One,

I'm referring to components of the understanding not physical hardware components. There are also many published papers on many of these pieces of understanding put together in larger form.

The "universal translator" is not published in any journal that I know of but pieces of it may be hinted at in various journals or at least some of the concepts but I haven't read any.

To articles of the energy technologies with full implications?

[One]

Originally Posted by Aaron

Hi One,

I'm referring to components of the understanding not physical hardware components. There are also many published papers on many of these pieces of understanding put together in larger form.

The "universal translator" is not published in any journal that I know of but pieces of it may be hinted at in various journals or at least some of the concepts but I haven't read any.

To articles of the energy technologies with full implications?

Yes, I didn't mean hardware either. I mean papers which describe the full theoretical implications of the various technologies you've described. For example:

Originally Posted by Aaron

"I have a battery charger and I can get more joules in actual work from the batteries I charge compared to joules of work that I put into it to charge them."

I would love to see a write up on this. This is the sort of thing I was wondering why you didn't submit to a journal along with instructions for creating the charger. I'd expect it to create quite a stir.

Also I found the experiments you did with increasing melatonin production fascinating. It would save many people from using dangerous cancer inducing UV tanning. Is there a paper on this?

p.s. for a greater good, PATHs has the potential, no pun intended, to revolutionize, education, medicine and many fields at once. On the energy technology side, yes, there are many technologies that are coming out and I will point to them, I'll even post schematics and will give very clear simple explanations of the workings of them that will take away the mystery that has surrounded these technologies. Also, please don't think you need a physicist to explain this to you unless you want to learn it in their technical jargon. The point I want to make is that I actually have a desire to empower people by letting them see the CONCEPTS visually in their mind with very simple analogies so that it will be easy to understand. When made simple like this, people truly are empowered as they can put a finger on things that have evaded them for lifetimes.

Oh yes, no doubt. I think it was Einstein that said that if you couldn't explain a concept to a 12 year old that you didn't truely understand it yourself.

However, there is much more to a technology beyond it's basic concept. I know that a computer is all about the logical switching of 1s and 0s, but that doesn't mean I could build a computer or even grasp it's finer points. These finer points are the reason I'm interested in asking a physicist. I hope you don't object.

kinerkid - You'll see a speech bubble button in the tool bar at the top. Highlight the text you want to quote and press it.

[jojo]

Originally Posted by dor

I wouldn't have minded so much if he had been honest about it, but it he won't admit that the curious number of new registerers hailing his 'arrival' wasn't orchestrated. Doesn't pass the smell test

Personally, I have put in all the time i am going to in this thread, he'll probably have his multiple registers and affilates bury these objections with glowing testimonials.

Dor, I know you are skeptical and I am not taking away from your comments or questions directed towards Aaron. However, I know that a lot of people have joined this forum from another forum (I have done my due research) when they found out that PATHS was being discussed here. There is NOTHING unusual about this; yes, they are supporters of PATHS and some are affilates, but they have been happily writing on the other forum for months and because the product has assisted them in their lives they want to share that with others. I can completely understand that. They are joining this forum of their own accord...because of their success with the product and they want to share their experiences and expand others' awareness of the potential of this product (this happens all the time...people discover a new product that works for them and they want to share that with others).

Dor, you have some legitimate questions and concerns, but I think it is also important to step back and look at the big picture objectively...check out the other forums on paths and what is being said there. You will see a cross-referencing of people on those forums and this forum. I am sure you are a member of various forums and discuss similar topics across them.

There are also people who have been members of this forum since it started (myself included) who are trying the product and are posting the results for others to have a look at.

I feel you are confusing your feelings towards Aaron and the flurry of posts backwards and forwards between you both, with the actual product and those who are genuinely posting to show how this product is/isn't working for them. It is not all 'glowing' testimonials; although I do feel that most have had positive results so far. And to be honest, there are a lot of positive 'life-changing' results that people have accredited to paths. I think that this is great. And in most of the the posts I have read, people still use other tools including meditiation, vision boards etc...it is another tool that has offered great benifit to many and maybe fasttracked their own potential and expanded their own awareness of what is possible (myself included).

You have invested a lot of energy in trying to get to the core of what paths is...which is fantastic, because I think that due to posts like yours, we have received a lot of information, that otherwise wouldn't have come to light (sometimes it takes a question for an answer to be given).

When I read your posts I feel like I am reading a personal attack on Aaron and you are not reading other posts which answer or give insight in to various concerns/questions you may have about the product.

I know that we (those of us who took the plunge) have been saying to people, try the product (as it offers a money back guarantee if not satified with the results after one month of correctly using the product), but, I think this is up to the individual...I recommend trying the product and then giving feedback on results/non-results. However, I acknowledge the concern of not knowing exactly what is going in to your sub-conscious (from the program) and some people not wanting their heads 'messed' with. Then again, if you think the programming is all a load of BS, then trying the product shouldn't raise these concerns, as you don't believe affecting the sub-conscious with 'subliminals' is possible.

Many smiles!

[jojo]

Paul, it was great to read your post of BLASTING out of bed!! What I like about what you have been writing as well is that you haven't shyed away from stating that nothing was happening; you have been upfront all along with your progress/trial on paths.

Your post today (yesterday? I'm an antipodean gal) was beaming with positive vibes...I can't quite put it in to words; but seriously man, beaming!! Also love that your wife waited for your little yogi to do his morning wake-up call! Hilarious!

Many smiles!

PS I just read your reply to Angela (and Angela's post as well) and I stand with you both completely on what you wrote. This has been a wee bit of a frustrating experience for me because I haven't been able to explain how paths works, but i know it works and I have had a lot of confusion in my head jumping from results that I can't explain to logic and back! You both put it so eloquently - THANK YOU!

[Aaron]

Originally Posted by One

I mean papers which describe the full theoretical implications of the various technologies you've described. For example:

I would love to see a write up on this. This is the sort of thing I was wondering why you didn't submit to a journal along with instructions for creating the charger. I'd expect it to create quite a stir.

Also I found the experiments you did with increasing melatonin production fascinating. It would save many people from using dangerous cancer inducing UV tanning. Is there a paper on this?

However, there is much more to a technology beyond it's basic concept. I know that a computer is all about the logical switching of 1s and 0s, but that doesn't mean I could build a computer or even grasp it's finer points. These finer points are the reason I'm interested in asking a physicist. I hope you don't object.

Hi One,

Here is a paper on what is happening in the batteries when charged with radiant potential instead of electron current, it is in pdf format:
http://www.*******.org/library/bedin...e-resistor.pdf

The charger was invented by a friend of mine and I have duplicated with repeatable predictable results many, many versions of the same thing with mechanical oscillators and also solid state oscillators. Been doing this for about 7 years. It has been studied by many univisersity professors, TUV (premier testing lab from Germany), countless others... Energy from the Vacuum A Documentary Series is a documentary by Emmy nominated producer William Gazecki and will be a full series...the first is on material that I'm going to explain some here in upcomings posts and the 2nd I believe focuses more on the battery charging technology.

Anyway, I can get more joules out that what I put in. Some people can think perpetual motion, over 100% efficient, etc.. but is not any of these things. I'll explain later. There are no physicists qualified to explain any of this to you as it flies in the face of everything they believe in. There are however a handful of them who have been open enough to explore open dissipative systems.

Actually it was melanin that was increased to darken skin simply by looking at a monitor with the instructions but NO pictures attached to it..appeared to be a black screen...the subjects did NOT know even what they were supposed to be watching but in several days, they were several shades darker. It was really done just to prove to the company that it wasn't placebo...because the developers themselves didn't believe the results from the other modules. They saw results and thought it was all placebo until they did this test. 1- not knowing what was supposed to happen, 2 - skin became darker, 3 - instructions were to increase melanin production. It was on a group of women. This test may be released in the future.

I don't object at all to you finding a physicist that can explain the finer points. I doubt you fill find one but good luck. I'll explain the finer points beyond concepts and even they can be explained in very simple terms. The science is in the realm of scalar electromagnetics. You will more easily find a Russian physicist qualifed to explain this than an American one as American schools have been overly protective of dogma instead of pursuing known scientific principles that challenge what they have been teaching. Did you see the link I posted about a two stage mechanical oscillator that demolishes the 3rd law of motion? Now that is a simple application that virtually anyone can build...it works, is simple and outputs about 12 times more work that the operator inputs and that doesn't mean it is over 100% efficient but it does mean the COP (coefficient of performance) is 12.0 as it is an open sytem.

[CdnNix]

Okay I have to step in here, I've been following the thread since it started and kinerkid, who are you? :P Like there is a point where flowery words belie the truth. I understand your a very positive person, but again, positivity can't mask reality. I agree Aaron has been very helpful and detailed, however he was not very kind in the last post. (last post being the one retorting against dor)

I felt very negative reading the "dynamic duo" directions of his post and the DOR comment was completely unnecessary aaron. There are other ways to address critics/cynics without having to name call. I understand the continued and repeat criticism is frustrating, but if you fully understand the results in your product, and the integrity of Paths and your position within it, than politely agree to disagree, explain you reasoning and let it be, welcome more criticism, if it's completely falsified, albeit seemingly attacking at times, such is life. Why attack back?

Clearly many, the majority, of people here, (those who haven't have yet to have the 30 days expire) using the product are experiencing amazing results and I myself am still very interested. Alas I'm a student and the money is a slight issue. But I'm still very adamant of trying paths within the next few months.

Nyways, just please continue your explanations, but if "attacks" come, no matter how twisted, they affect you in no way whatsoever, because truly the results are all that matter. Accept their presence, prove their falsity, and let's get on with more info behind paths and results of people using it. Surly someone of so much gratitude, openness, and knowledge in fields like subjective reality wouldn't need to be so aggressive in their responses. (That was not an attack, just a gentle nudge to keep you positive and not sink so low, because clearly, you've demonstrated you don't have to be) I also respect the fact that it does hurt and anger one to have their creations "smeared", but again, we're all here for personal development and character and attitude are a big part of that.

So let's all agree to end the attacking, respect each others opinions, and let the actual results speak for themselves. Because really that's all that matters to me and anyone else considering this, yes the criticism can cause people to second guess momentarily but if it works, repeatably, than again that's all that matters.

[searstower]

However, I acknowledge the concern of not knowing exactly what is going in to your sub-conscious (from the program) and some people not wanting their heads 'messed' with.

Now that we are back to the subject of getting weird stuff programmed into your head without your knowing it, I thought I'd mention this.

I'm trained as a hypnosis master and in my experience and training, it doesn't seem to be possible to implant something into someone's mind if they have strong values or beliefs against it. So, if you are worried about there being a malicious message in the program, you can sleep safe.

Unless you actually want to be a terrorist, no one can make you one even by implanting it into your subconscious. For those who haven't experienced hypnosis or PATHS, I'd liken it to having a new first instinct or initial reaction.

You can still choose to do something else, but instead of craving a cookie from the bakery downstairs, you might find that you packed a healthy snack in your bag that morning and are suddenly craving that. Or I find myself in front of the water cooler filling up my water bottle without consciously thinking that I should drink more water.

Anyhow, I thought I'd post my experience in case someone needs to hear it.

Radiant Rebecca

[Aaron]

CdnNix, you're right. I agree that I disagree with those 2, have indicated why, period end of story as far as I'm concerned. Lets move on.

[CdnNix]

Sounds good to me Aaron, end of negativity and attacking here.

And again thank you for your huge dedication here, explaining and answering all these questions. Your a good guy. As is dor and everyone else, just more skeptical and less open/firm than others. Keep the critisism coming if you feel so dor, but really, try the trial if in doubt, just experience, and if it works great. If it doesn't chapter closed. Get on with that productive life of yours, you realist you! :P

[One]

Originally Posted by Aaron

They saw results and thought it was all placebo until they did this test. 1- not knowing what was supposed to happen, 2 - skin became darker, 3 - instructions were to increase melanin production. It was on a group of women. This test may be released in the future.

That's really amazing! Are you planning to issue a press release? How long do you expect before you publish this?

Originally Posted by Aaron

Anyway, I can get more joules out that what I put in. Some people can think perpetual motion, over 100% efficient, etc.. but is not any of these things. I'll explain later. There are no physicists qualified to explain any of this to you as it flies in the face of everything they believe in. There are however a handful of them who have been open enough to explore open dissipative systems.

Originally Posted by Aaron

Here is a paper on what is happening in the batteries when charged with radiant potential instead of electron current, it is in pdf format:
http://www.*******.org/library/bedin...e-resistor.pdf

Thanks Aaron, but I should have been more clear, my fault. I'm not qualified to scientifically appraise the paper, though I will read it. The paper you linked me to is on the Energetic Science Ministries website. I'm looking for a physics journal. The great thing about submitting a paper to a peer reviewed journal is that it lets other physicists worldwide reference to and expand on your paper. This way knowledge builds on itself.

Also, if you could clear this up for me:

Originally Posted by Aaron

No, this isn't over 100% efficient.

The author of the paper you linked me to is Thomas E. Bearden he refers to the technology on his website as overunity. Overunity means more than 100% efficient.

Also I was a little alarmed to note that although Mr. Bearden refers to himself as Doctor, his degree is from an unaccredited university with no campus or buildings. Trinity College and University. In fact, the top of their homepage says "Providing degrees based on your previous life experience."

[Dan.Linehan]

Aaron,

Namecalling and personal insults are unacceptable on these forums.

As this is the second time that members have become less than civil with one another on this thread, we're going to go ahead and close it.

If anyone would like to post personal experiences with PATHS, please do so here.