|08-27-2008, 01:11 PM||#1 (permalink)|
Join Date: Aug 2008
1 million USD experiment - contradiction?
I am a bit puzzled about how the intention of the 1-million USD experiment is phrased, as it seems to have an internal contradiction in terms of polarity.
The intention is phrased this way:
In an easy and relaxed manner,
In a healthy and positive way,
In its own perfect time,
For the highest good of all,
I intend 1,000,000 USD to come into my life,
And into the lives of everyone who holds this intention
The problem is that there the core of this intention aligns well with a polarity of inflow, but the phrases "for the highest good of all" and "...into the lives of everyone who holds this intention" align better with a polarity of outflow.
Now, a key principle for the Law of Attraction to work optimally as explained by Steve is that we should not mix polarities in a single intention, so how do you explain this apparent contradiction in the 1-million USD experiment?
|08-30-2008, 01:18 PM||#6 (permalink)|
Join Date: Nov 2006
The reason this isn't contradictory is that polarity isn't about a single intention, it's an all-inclusive way of being. If you intend to receive $1M for personal gain vs. if you intend to receive $1M for the highest good of all can be decided based on what polarity you wish to align with.
I don't use polarity myself.
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Million Dollar Experiment||pianoperformer||Intention-Manifestation||3||05-23-2008 06:52 AM|
|Million ($1,000,000) Dollar Experiment||rsinghal2000||Business & Financial||4||02-22-2008 09:41 PM|
|Million Dollar Experiment||Kosmos||Intention-Manifestation||2||09-04-2007 09:05 PM|
|Million Dollar Experiment||jtrikster||Intention-Manifestation||8||07-15-2007 02:05 AM|
|Million Dollar Experiment Manifests $4 Million (Blog)||Savage||Steve Pavlina||13||03-08-2007 04:36 PM|
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:18 PM.