Winning the Euromillions lottery

[Phi]

How would you go about winning the Euromillions lottery (or any other lottery) with intention-manifestation.

I remember Steve Pavlina once wrote about a couple that used intention-manifestation to win the lottery, but unfortunately he did not now the details of the story.

Apparently the couple Steve knew about said to everybody they meet that they had already won, but it wasn't until a few weeks later they actually won.

Is that the way to win? Or is there a better way (using intention-manifestation)?

[Acting Like Godot]

I guess it probably goes like this.

Firstly, you must have real desire to win the lottery.

To generate that degree of desire, you probably have to know what you want that money for.

Since the 1st prize would be a lot of money, this might take a lot of imagination.

For example, if the first prize is USD 100,000,000 and all you can think of wanting is a Ferrari, a house with a swimming pool, and a trip around the world, then you're probably not going to be able to muster up enough desire.

After all, a Ferrari, a house with a swimming pool and a trip around the world would cost a lot less than USD 100,000,000.

Since I can't really imagine what I would do with USD100,000,000, I guess I have to stop writing here.

I suggest that if what you want is really just a Ferrari, a house with a swimming pool and a trip around the world, then please just go manifest a Ferrari, a house with a swimming pool and a trip around the world. I think that the IM attempt would be far less taxing than attempting to win the lottery.

[Markus74]

I'd be interesting to interview the recent winners of the Euromillions and how many were surprised by their win and considered it a nice, unexpected event and how many actually intended and manifested the win!

I'm sure the former outweigh the later hugely. If there's a 'manifester' to be found at all, lol.

But go ahead: intend and manifest a Euromillions lotery win! But don't forget to report here if you've won!

[Acting Like Godot]

To be honest, I can't see how ANY lottery winner would have EVER bought a ticket without having AT LEAST a glimmer of a thought / hope / belief that he MIGHT win something.

[Markus74]

Originally Posted by Acting Like Godot

To be honest, I can't see how ANY lottery winner would have EVER bought a ticket without having AT LEAST a glimmer of a thought / hope / belief that he MIGHT win something.

LOL, so a glimmer of hope is enough? Then I should have won too

And since everyone who buys a ticket has this hope, how will the 'Universe' decide who will win? The one with the biggest hope? But as I said, most winners didn't REALLY think they would win. They hoped for it, but they didn't believe it.

And so if it's the Universe that decides who will win, this would mean that the it has to interact and physically influence the rolling balls so that exactly the right numbers will be drawn. Sure ...

[Phi]

Originally Posted by Acting Like Godot

To be honest, I can't see how ANY lottery winner would have EVER bought a ticket without having AT LEAST a glimmer of a thought / hope / belief that he MIGHT win something.

Very true. Why play if you don't have a glimmer of hope?

[Acting Like Godot]

Originally Posted by Markus74

LOL, so a glimmer of hope is enough? Then I should have won too

You must read more carefully. You have confused yourself with my description of the cause and the effect here.

The glimmer of hope (cause) is enough to make the person buy the lottery ticket (effect). If you consider it completely hopeless, you would not even buy the ticket. Therefore you certainly wouldn't win.

[Markus74]

Originally Posted by Acting Like Godot

Y
The glimmer of hope (cause) is enough to make the person buy the lottery ticket (effect). If you consider it completely hopeless, you would not even buy the ticket. Therefore you certainly wouldn't win.

Ok, true. But what defines the winner then? Especially since most, if not all, of the winners haven't even heard of the LoA?

[Acting Like Godot]

Why don't you ask David Bohm? After all, he's your favourite kind of guy, a scientist (he even helped to build the world's first atomic bomb). According to Bohm, the little numbered balls spinning in the lottery machine are made of subatomic particles popping in and out of existence.

Also, according to his scientific theory of nonlocality at the quantum physical level, how exactly the little numbered balls pop in and out of existence can be determined by nonlocal events (eg a man sitting in a room 1,000 miles away, thinking to himself "I need the money, I need the money").

In fact, according to Bohm's theory, how the little numbered balls pop in and out of existence cannot not be determined by nonlocal events.

Then according to Fred Alan Wolf, another PhD-in-Physics chap whom I've already introduced you, the little numbered balls are not real .... unless they are being observed by a consciousness. If there is no consciousness focusing on the little balls, they simply don't exist.

Maybe that's what Bohm means by "popping out of existence". Hmmm. Since the balls wouldn't even exist at all unless a consciousness was focusing on them, I wonder what other effect that the consciousness could have on the balls. What if, for example, the consciousness were to say to itself: "I need the money .... I need the money .... "

Bohm's friend, Albert Einstein, is even stranger - he thinks that alternate dimensions could exist! Goodness me, if you can believe that, ANYTHING could be explained. Maybe every guy who really wants to win the lottery will get to win it, but in a different dimension. Boy, that must mean that there are many, many different dimensions.

No wonder Albert Einstein said that there could be an infinite number of dimensions in existence. Alas, superstring theory currently says that there are only up to 10 or 11 different dimensions. If that's right, only 10 or 11 people can win the first prize in the same lottery. That sounds weird, huh.

Or maybe all these folks - Einstein, Bohm, Wold etc - are all just crazy. You'd better stick to reading Steve Pavlina's articles on how to effectively manage your time.

"Ahh, time," says Einstein. "My fourth dimension. I've always wondered how to manage it well."

These quantum physicists - they're all talking nonsense. I'm getting a headache. Next time I'm just gonna stick to simple stuff like Jesus and Buddha. Here's something from DzogChen Buddhism:

".... the energy of an individual is essentially without form and free from duality. What appears as a world of apparently external phenomena, is the energy of the individual him or herself. There is nothing external or separate from the individual. Everything that manifests in the individual's field of experience is a continuum. This is the 'Great Perfection' that is discovered in Dzogchen practice."

Nothing is external or separate from the individual. Golly ... that sounds like those little numbered balls could be part of the same guy sitting on the chair going "I need the money, I need the money."

[Markus74]

Now THAT was very helpful, Acting ...

[ReallyGoodIdeas]

Well I tried this recently. I bought a lottery ticket for the mid-week draw. I haven't bought a lottery ticket in about 20 years, but I'd been intending the million dollar experiment, instead of my previous line (prosperity comes to me in new and interesting ways every day), and my daily money seemed to be dwindling.

So I thought about jumpstarting it with the lottery ticket. I decided I'd spend $5. the ticket came to about $3, so I also bought 2 $1 scratchies. The lottery - nothing! But the scratchies gave me $6. So I was up on the deal, but not by much. I've never been one for lottery tickets, s mayb that rubbed off, who knows?

I've since gone back to saying my old line above. I'm finding that cuts to the chase quicker and gives better results myself. Since I've gone back to the old line, money has been coming in. I said it this morning while reading the paper, and within 1 minute, my phone rang with a new client, I'm meeting them tomorrow morning. :-)

Joy and prosperity to us all!

Hazel

[Amit]

I do the Euro Lottery syndicate at work and there are 15 of us participating at the moment. Even though no one I work with knows about the PD stuff I do in my spare time e.g. blogging, life coaching etc I decided for the hell of to send out Steve's Million Dollar Affirmation to all of them. I think they probably thought I was nuts and belonged in a looney bin but I just thought what the heck!

I've been trying various methods like using Steve's Million Dollar affirmation, I've been trying the 3 steps of the LOA, and just generally focussing on wealth and abundance.

We haven't won anything major as yet but when we do I'll let you know!

[Brutha]

Bohm's friend, Albert Einstein, is even stranger - he thinks that alternate dimensions could exist! Goodness me, if you can believe that, ANYTHING could be explained. Maybe every guy who really wants to win the lottery will get to win it, but in a different dimension. Boy, that must mean that there are many, many different dimensions.

Einstein just labeld time a dimension their is nothing mystic about it.
People don't live in dimensions, they live in a world with has multiple dimensions.
If you want to argue the Multiverses Theory than at least let Einstein alone.

[Acting Like Godot]

Originally Posted by Brutha

People don't live in dimensions, they live in a world with has multiple dimensions.

Ah, I see. And the world - does it exist in different dimensions?

[Phi]

Originally Posted by Amit

I do the Euro Lottery syndicate at work and there are 15 of us participating at the moment. Even though no one I work with knows about the PD stuff I do in my spare time e.g. blogging, life coaching etc I decided for the hell of to send out Steve's Million Dollar Affirmation to all of them. I think they probably thought I was nuts and belonged in a looney bin but I just thought what the heck!

A brave move that demands respect. It's fantastic when people try to inspire eachother or introduce something new, so we avoid those boring workplace conversations about 'safe' subjects.

[Phi]

Originally Posted by Acting Like Godot

Why don't you ask David Bohm?...

Very interesting, thank you.

[Amit]

Thanks Phi,

Like i said, I have no idea if it had any impact at all but you never know until you try!