| | |||||||
| Health & Fitness Health issues, diet, exercise, sleep, fitness, endurance, flexibility, strength, physical skills, sports, health habits, healing |
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| | #1 (permalink) |
| Family Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Nationality: British Soul: Otherworldly Current Location: Barcelona, Spain
Posts: 5,960
|
After giving up a really aggressive 100% raw diet, I seem to have found a balance at roughly 50% raw. This is just eating what I feel like eating. By focusing on being conscious on how things make me feel when I eat them I've slowly started wanting to eat better. Nowadays I never buy junk food (except the occasional chocolate, but since this morning I think I'll give that a pass in future too. Unless I'm depressed and need to fill the void and make myself more depressed, which chocolate is great for). I really crave raw foods! I also love sprouts. My body asks for it. I eat too much cooked and my body goes, "hey! This feels heavy and dead! We need some life energy here!" Sprouts, even cooked sprouts give huge amounts of life energy. I actually find I can't eat too much, I just can't take all that energy. I wonder if my body will naturally become 100% raw over time if I listen to it? |
| | |
| | #2 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA
Posts: 3,747
|
It is great to see that someone is thinking for themselves and using math. Aren't you afraid of the scary old math master? One group found that eating 85% raw was ideal for them. My study shows that the ideal ratio of raw to cooked food is 1 + square root of 5 divided by 2. It is 61.80339887... % raw. It is the golden ratio or the Divine Proportion. The Fibonacci sequence approaches this number. Last edited by ginkgo; 08-25-2009 at 09:22 PM. |
| | |
| | #4 (permalink) |
| Banned Join Date: May 2007 Location: Philadelphia, PA, USA
Posts: 3,747
|
Well 61.8% is better or more than 50%. Actually the stress of measuring the food that you eat is not good for health. Whereas fun and humor is good for health. Math is FUNdamental. Are you too serious?
|
| | |
| | #6 (permalink) |
| Member Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 54
|
This topic is a bit disappointing, not because the posts aren't good, but because eating sucks.. Why should I need to do anything to keep myself alive? For real, I have access to every field of technology that I can imagine, and yet.. I still have to move my jaw up and down, while articulating the position of food - mulched food, around in my mouth, and then swallow it all... How much longer til we get to replace flesh with steel, and annihilate the need to eat, defecate, breathe, and sleep? |
| | |
| | #7 (permalink) | ||
| Family Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Bucharest, Romania
Posts: 1,370
| Quote:
Quote:
I am certain you can eliminate the need for food through technological means, such as a perfusion or eating "combat rations" but I don't think that is what you have in mind. This reminds me of a line from Star Trek said by Seven of Nine - "Oral consumption is inefficient" Last edited by bluedragon; 08-26-2009 at 07:42 AM. | ||
| | |
| | #8 (permalink) | |
| Member Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 54
| Quote:
as far as I know, anyway. <--- more on that Everyone I know says I do it wrong, but I'm still alive and feel physically well, so.. perhaps they don't know what wrong actually is.. Last edited by Dogs; 08-26-2009 at 07:49 AM. | |
| | |
| | #9 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Nationality: British Soul: Otherworldly Current Location: Barcelona, Spain
Posts: 5,960
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #10 (permalink) | |
| Family Member Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,829
| Quote:
You eat to get energy from the food you eat. No eating = no gained energy = lethargy, followed by your body eating all fats, then proteins in your muscles, followed by death if prolonged. | |
| | |
| Bookmarks |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:46 PM.




