| | |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Business & Financial Career, work, money, income generation, personal finance, investing, debt, wealth, abundance, entrepreneurship, sales, marketing, SEO, commerce, economics, blogging, podcasting |
|
Welcome to the Personal Development for Smart People Forums, the place for lively, intelligent discussion of all personal growth issues -- physical, mental, financial, social, emotional, spiritual, and more. You're currently viewing as a guest, which gives you limited read-only access. By joining our free community, you'll be able to post your own messages, access many members-only features, see the new messages posted since your last visit, and of course remove this header message. Registration is fast, simple, and free, so please join today. If you arrived here from a search engine, you may want to explore the main site first, which includes hundreds of deep and insightful articles on a variety of personal development topics. |
| View Poll Results: What is the most effective way to become wealthy? | |||
| Focusing on money | | 9 | 13.04% |
| Focusing on providing value | | 48 | 69.57% |
| I don't know. | | 12 | 17.39% |
| Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll | |||
| | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| |||
| I would actually say that the surest way to beome wealthy is to carry very little debt. Debt is a huge drag on people - most pay more in interest than on tax. But if you can get rid of debt, things ease immediately. eg my sister paid off her mortgage two years ago - she is only in her mid-thirties, but every spare pound went into overpaying debt, and she was pretty frugal with everything else. It took her seven years of hard focus to do it. Of course now she is laughing, she gets to keep all of her salary, with no housing overhead, so even if she is spending far more than previously, she is also accumulating savings very fast. I would advise everyone to clear their debts first. Once you've done that you have so many more options in place, as the claims on your income are reduced. |
| |||
| Teatree, I agree mostly except for paying off your house. I am unsure about the UK but let me give you a scenario of the US. Lets assume someone has debt of $200K on a $300K house in the US at 6% interest. A good portion of interest of that 6% is tax deductable; so essentially the interest is more like 3 to 4%. Now lets say that someone has a matching 401K with 100% contribution from employer. The person not only can earn more than 4% on average but they also get a matching contribution from the employer AND this is all pre-tax whereas making payments on your house is post-tax. So they get a higher rate of return, one tax deduction, matching contribution AND pretax savings. Or lets say someone didn't have a 401K and they simply invested money into a CD or other investment. Historically the person would make a higher rate of return than the 3 or 4% they were paying in real interest on the house. Almost all professional financial advisors in North America DO NOT recommend paying off the house early. But I think your sister sounds like a pretty smart person to me; after all she saved irregardless. I'm impressed ! Last edited by Still Growing : 10-07-2008 at 09:49 PM. |
| |||
| Still Growing - in the UK we used to have tax relief on mortgage interest, but it got abolished in 1997, as the govt thought it caused people to speculate on housing un-necessarily and carry too much debt. So be warned, it could get abolished your end too. Many people advance the idea that you would be better off putting money into tax-free vehicles that allow stocks and shares (in the UK, ISAs and Pensions, in the US, 401ks). But they neglect the safety and risk side of things. When you pay off your mortgage quickly you are guaranteed to become richer. There is no risk - after all, you have to pay off the debt at some point, and the longer you leave it, the more interest you pay. Investing in stocks by contrast is hugely risky. On paper you might make more than 3% per annum return, but in practice, you might make zero, or even a negative return. The Dow Jones was 11773 in Jan 2000, but is below 10,000 now. This isn't a new phenomenon. The Dow Jones for instance was flat from 1937 to 1950, and then flat again from 1966 to 1982, and the 1950 to 1966 rise was very shallow indeed (you'd have been better off sticking your money in a deposit account). The go-go period from 1983 to 2000 was as rare as the period from 1914-1929. IMO you should always go for the risk-free returns first - which means paying down debt including mortgage debt. Once you have your shellter all paid for, then you can afford to start taking other risks - it won't matter then if you make some losses, as you will have had your basics all sorted out. |
| |||
| I worked towards my passion of game making for over 10 months & made a total of $0.02, it never financially paid off. Now I opened myself up to other income sources & am making about $10/day & will be making $70/day by the end of this month; I also still believe I will be able to fit some game making in, but not currently. I think you need to focus on both, but I voted focusing on generating money. |
| |||
| Quote:
It isn't the definition that I have in mind. I think that there are things that money can't buy that are still valuable. Think about twitter. Twitter is an example of a company that said, we focus on value and will worry later about money. I think that Twitter does provide value. Quote:
Most people simply haven't found something to be passionate about. Quote:
If I focus on value, value might be my goal.
__________________ I am always open for feedback on my posts. That might focused on the argument at hand or on my writing style. If your feedback would go offtopic feel free to send me a Personal Message. I don't believe in Beliefs. |
| |||
| Quote:
Quote:
What is the most effective way to become wealthy? The choices were: 1. Focusing on money 2. Focusing on providing value 3. I don't know. Now where on earth would I think that this thread was about finding "what is the most effective way to become wealthy?" In over 80% of the posts in this thread alone the word "money" was used. Now you are telling me that this thread was not speaking about money? Brutha, just be patient and you'll find something to disagree with me on. You don't have to jump the gun prematurely to find something to pick at me. In almost every thread you disagree, poke and prod with what I say. Just be patient and I'll say something that is inaccurate or I'll mispeak and then have to clarify. Then you can pounce. Don't be so eager to find something to disagree on. Last edited by Still Growing : 10-08-2008 at 01:22 PM. |
| |||
| Quote:
Since the UK (as you say) no longer allows for tax deductions on home ownership or morgage interest it does make it a little more appealing to pay off the house. What has the UK stock market averaged over the past 30 years in increases vs what was your sister's home interest at? Just curious. Also, there is no correct answer. I'm replying to you because I might start paying more to pay down my mortgage. Currently I do pay an additional 10% per month and that alone will reduce many years off the mortgage. Maybe I'll increase it to 30% additional. I am however looking to start moving money out of CDs and into the stock market soon. I think it still has a way to go down and of course I'll invest into company with great debt equity ratio. Last edited by Still Growing : 10-08-2008 at 01:29 PM. |
| |||
| Quote:
Another thing to remember about all this being wealthy is that your compensation from providing value isn't all financial. You will get compensated in different ways. For example Steve is generating a lot of good karma, goodwill, relationships, credibility and other things. And the question about making a lot of money (a financial asset) is of lesser importance if you consider the other five life assets I posted previously which will provide way better returns on your time, energy and money in the long term if you invest in them. |
| |||
| Still Growing Quote:
There is this myth that stocks always go up. No they don't! The 1982-2000 period was an abberation, as was the 1914-1929 period. And you only really saw returns if you invested at the start of those periods. Most people on this board probably started investing towards the end of that late 20th C bull run, and have lost out. I'm not sure we are going to see high returns again for several decades in the western world. The other thing you have to consider is that if you have a 25 year mortgage, you pay a hell of a lot of interest over that time. Crude rule of thumb is that you pay roughly three times your purchase price once you've paid interest and repaid your capital - that is, if you purchase a home for £100,000, you end up forking out £300,000 over the 25 years before you have paid the debt. That's around £200,000 in interest, which is a small fortune. Much better to pay off the debt asap. As I said, once you have your shelter all paid for, you can afford to take risks and not bat an eyelid if you make a few losses here and there (some losses are inevitable when you take risks). But you do need to secure basics first. Think of all those people losing their homes and moving into trailers - it's not pretty when you lose your shelter. My sister is only in her mid thirties - it was a lot of hard work paying off the debt so fast, she was shopping at Aldi, while others were living it up eating out every night. But she now has her whole life ahead, with good earnings, and shelter all paid for, and she can enjoy herself, work part-time, afford to have children, etc etc. More important than anything is the sense of peace of mind - it's hard to describe how well you sleep when you have no debt and your home paid for, and are therefore pretty much invulnerable to the vagaries of the economy. It's a priceless feeling, worth more than the actual wealth you accrue by paying off debt. |
| |||
| I think that you certainly have to provide value, no doubt about that, but do have to be aware of the money side too. You need a good balance of both really I think. |
| |||
| Teatee, Historically the stock market has given a higher rate of return than 4%. Of course if you look at 5 years vs 30 years then that is not always the case. I like the idea of paying off the house because its a sure thing. Its really like comparing a guaranteed 4% savings vs the opportunity for a 12% return IF you get in at the right time and get out at the right time and are diversified. Of course right now is the time to buy if you select the right company. |
| |||
| Still Growing, it depends on which 30 year period you are looking at. Lots of people can't let go of the recent past, particularly the dot.com boom, and keep believing it will happen again. It will of course happen again, but not for a few decades. What is going on in the markets right now is very nasty indeed, and will burn many. If you do buy shares, buy companies with a shedload of cash on their books and no debt - they will be the only ones left standing after this. I recommend reading "The Intelligent Investor" by Benjamin Graham - I think it's available on Amazon. He talks about investing in the post-wall street crash environment of the 40's and 50's (when the Dow was flat, but he still made money) and has useful things to say. He was Warren Buffet's guru. It's a great book, full of scepticism and wisdom - the best investors look at the downside and diligently protect themselves from it. It's the wishful thinking ones, who only believe things can go up, that get hurt. |
| |||
| Teatree, Maybe you're right I can't find the data. I assumed that the averages over every 30 year period were higher than 4%, even from 1920 to 1950 hitting the US depression for example. Are you sure it depends on which 30 years? I'm curious to know because I'm not 100% sure in what I'm saying about this. |
| |||
| i thinkwhen you create value,money willcome.
__________________ ...get some tips at www.completebizinfo.com |
| |||
| I think if you focus on making money you will find yourself having to focus on creating value. So maby start with focusing on money itself if you wanted a hollow goal like that. |
| |||
| This is not always true. You can create value for a single person and no money will ever come if too few people have the demand. To be more clear you could add "a lot" in front of value or "for enough people" after value then its far more accurate. |
| |||
| Focusing on finding the sweet spot between doing something you love and making money from it. Usually that implies you are creating value. (unless you are a crook and loving it) After that, it's a matter of working hard and providing even more value.
__________________ http://www.Gtdagenda.com - use Gtdagenda to manage your Projects and get things done. |

