Well, Science before trying to prove the existence of a entity that created the universe would have to know what's the universe. We don't know the end or the beginning of time and space or we don't have proofs about it. And even we hardly imagine we could understand a possible proven example.
"Okey, that's was the beginning, what before?" "That's the end, what's outside, then?". Science is lost like a newborn baby in these topics. Even human brain is lost, I think.
Before believing in a entity creator of the universe... I have to believe in the universe so know what it is. And I don't know what it is. Space and time, you know...
So well, possibly there's an "entity" behind it (or around it), well the universe it's an entity itself...
"And the Universe said Let there be light and there was light".
So in the end what the heck is the Universe, God. I don't know. I don't believe but I don't deny any explanation.
But I believe that if one day we understand where we are, etc. it would be a huge advance. What kind of knowing we have if we don't know what Universe is. For instance, Einstein theories about physics and quantums and etc. lead to today's technology with laser, nuclear, mobiles, internet, etc.
Just knowing what's inside the atoms leads to huge advances in knowledge.
There's a giant device in Europe prepared to soon go even further than we know now about quantums, when we'll know we'll change.
|