View Single Post
Old 08-07-2007, 09:28 PM   #151 (permalink)
Mark Lapierre
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 1,061
Mark Lapierre is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chinese Dragon View Post
I'm sorry to say, but yes it does. Science is about obtaining knowledge by using the scientific method. And guess what, theories are formed by using... wait for it... the scientific method. Even if the definition of science doesn't actually come out and say those things doesn't mean the scientific method doesn't imply them.
There is a difference between implication and confirmation. The lack of data supporting a confirmation is the reason those theories are often incomplete. So where is the flaw in a process which produces theories which acknowledges their limits? To say there is a contradiction between unconfirmed implications of theories is a flaw in science is the same as saying that someone who says 2 + 2 = 5 has found a flaw in mathematics.
Mark Lapierre is offline   Reply With Quote