View Single Post
Old 09-06-2011, 01:19 PM   #12 (permalink)
ButterflyWoman
Family Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Down the infinite rabbit hole
Posts: 1,575
ButterflyWoman is absolutely unstoppableButterflyWoman is absolutely unstoppableButterflyWoman is absolutely unstoppableButterflyWoman is absolutely unstoppableButterflyWoman is absolutely unstoppableButterflyWoman is absolutely unstoppableButterflyWoman is absolutely unstoppableButterflyWoman is absolutely unstoppableButterflyWoman is absolutely unstoppableButterflyWoman is absolutely unstoppableButterflyWoman is absolutely unstoppable
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richful View Post
I respectfully disagree
I don't think we're in disagreement, though. Maybe only over semantics.

My first point was that the term "metaphysics" has a history of philosophical use. In fact, you can still find it used in fully accredited universities around the world, in the philosophy departments (I just finished a university course with "metaphysics" in the title, in fact, and it was entirely academic in nature).

I never said that science as currently known didn't come out of philosophy, because I know that it did. (Wrote an essay about that, in fact )

My other point was that science (as we now know and define it) DOES investigate matters which fit the classic philosophical category "metaphysics", hence the link to the collection of scientific and academic papers relating to the topic of metaphysics-in-the-philosophical-sense.

I don't see any disagreement. Nor do I see an oxymoron.

Last edited by ButterflyWoman; 09-06-2011 at 04:43 PM. Reason: Typo fix ;)
ButterflyWoman is offline   Reply With Quote