thanks for the link to the skeptic's dictionary I've never seen that before, I read a few of his things and they are really good exept he seems to have the same problem my friend dose when viewing things logicly.
when me and my friend are debaiting something paranormal or whatever he seams to go into every situation with the intent to prove it wrong and assumes things are the way he veiws the world (nothing more then he can see touch ect.).
though the skeptic seams to do a good job of laying out the facts and it makes me retinks what I've herd about full moon stuff but what he said 'studies have failed to show a reliable and significant correlation' I worry about because I wouldn't put it past a person like him to shrug off evedance the rest of us would not -
why else would he be called the skeptic?
|