Quote:
Originally Posted by MrBig  That is why science uses certain protocols to test what is real and what is not real, and to make sure that the interpretation is correct.
Yes, these protocols are not perfect and scientists make mistakes, etc, but just because our experiences are subjective, does not mean the objective reality does not exist or depends on our observation.
I don’t have a problem believing that the gravity is not real; I think it would be very cool if it were so, but on what basis should I reject my subjective interpretation of gravity? |
SR places creation with consciousness and there is only one consciousness. A whole reality thought and belief package is structured to maintain the perception of physical reality, things are created like gravity, air, wind, earth, everything tangible, but they are all creations to make reality acceptable and believable, even enjoyble, but as they are all creations, then other things can be created also.
You would only ever change your fundamental beliefs about the state of reality if you required to do that, why would you not believe that gravity existed anymore? So you could fly or float around, but what happens after that? How would that affect you and everyone around you? How would it change the reality? Would it be so earth shattering, that your reality would break?
Anything is possible, but somethings may not change for dramatic change could destabilize the reality to a point where it becomes unacceptable for consciousness to maintain it. Consciousness will never do something (while entirely possible) to damage or seriously alter the reality it has created, that's not the point of consciousness creating a stable reality in the first place.
Max