[unicorn]

Ok Steve, you have on numerous occasions said you like a challenge. Here is one for you:
How does this decision strategy, and your description of youself in the about section fit with your intention to identify with consciousness within your beliefsystem of SR? Will it help or hinder you in your climb through the levels of consciousness?

My question is within the context "How are you programming your subconscious mind?". I define your subconscious mind as the level of your mind that takes care of all the stuff you have learned to do so well that you do not have to think about it to do it. This part of the mind follows instructions literally, and are also involved in automatic sorting of all your sensory input into blocks your conscious mind can deal with, that is your filters as you descirbed so humerously in the article 10 Weaknesses of Human Intelligence. These filters are very much involved in how much extrasensory information will filter through in addition to the commonly accepted senses. This definition/context is a very short and weak summary that stems from the study of hypnosis.

I was wondering if you have considered the effect of instructing your subconscious mind every time you make a decision with such very clear identity definitions on the physical you on your ability to experiencially and through inner realisation get in touch with the identity of being consciousness itself.... If the data from the field of hypnosis is correct, you are actually hypnotising yourself to identify heavily with your body and ego-personality and recommending that to others as well, while at the same time promoting SR and identification with one all-pervading consciousness. Getting any conflicts out of this? Or maybe less benefit of subscribing SR beliefs than possible?

You place high value on being congruent. I do not know you well enough to say if I have spotted incongruency in you with this, and the information you blog about is only a fraction of what goes on with you, I know. But just judging from your writings, this does look like a potential incongruency to me... So I'm posing the question - have you thought about this - and if you have, how do you put it together to protect your congruency?