Quote:
Originally Posted by torilink  my point was that when Max said, "If you want to create better, then cast aside thought until you need it to validate the creation. " |
It's the overlaid process of thought on top of choice that is a perception that thought creates. I define thought as something that can be created and have an opposite. I think happy, I think sad, but choice creates the thoughts and there is no opposite of choice that's why it is the creative power of the entire experience.
You only need to cast aside thought if you want to create better. You can still have all the thoughts you like, thoughts are good things for they validate, but they disguise true creative power.
All the PD gurus say the same thing, you must think as if it's real now, even if you put a time frame on it's manifestation, think as if it's real now. But what you're really doing here is
choosing for it to be so, right now and then layering thought on top of it to validate choice.
You choose it and then think about it to validate it, the thoughts keep validating it and if that's the way you prefer to create, then that's fine, but you can make a simple choice and it will manifest just as a simple choice with lots of thought on top will also manifest.
The thing I do not like about thought in the manifestation process is that no matter how well you can focus thought, you will always at some stage suffer opposite thoughts that can undermine the whole process. When you make a choice and know it, there can never be an opposite, the choice is made, it's done. If the choice doesn't manifest, then you didn't actually choose it, you chose something else.
The whole point of this is to simplify the manifestation process. How many thoughts do we have a day? 50,000? They do not all manifest into physical reality because they do not create, they are creations to validate choice.
That's how I see it, works for me
Max