First of all I want to appologise if the next sentence seems a bit arrogant, but in regards to your question I see no way around it: Steve's article on the levels of consciousness is a gross oversimplification of what this scale really means and how it can be interpreted. If you want to use that scale for growth you need to look a lot deeper into it's origin and the context Hawkins used to build it. To quote Hawkins himself: "A calibrated statement is only true within the context used when making the statement." Steve has changed the context slightly from Hawkin's work with this, so your should read more about it before trying to calibrate yourself.
I think the major confusion stems from labeling the levels with an emotion-name. That could lead one to believe that when one is experiencing such an emotion that makes one calibrate to the corresponding level. Not true. An enlightened person above 600 will experience the full range of emotions on the scale, and sometimes even more intensely even. Above 600 is where you get direct experience of oneness with all-that-is, and that also means access to every possible feeling ever created in the universe. It just affects you differently from that level of awareness. So we are not talking about feeling the emotions, but how you relate to your emotions and how that makes you respond and interpret the world. Below 200 you are not even conscious of acting on the grounds of your emotions, or that others may see things differently. You do not sound like you have that syndrome
.
Level 500 named Love is where you cross into having "pshychic" type experiences of connecting to the love energy of the universe, that is the beginning of experiencing the interconnectedness of all things. It has really nothing to do with the emotion one commonly associates with love. The main difference is starting to have experiences and an awareness of something beyond the mind and emotions, and that experience extends throughout the 500's until reaching enlightment at 600+. At 540 judgements become irrelevant as one then starts experiencing the interconnectedness so much that one habitually is able to see and love the innocent spirit behind negative behavior-patterns and negative emotional stuckness, that's why it is labeled Unconditional love.
From your post I would say you are somewhere between 400 and 499. Your intellect is well developed, you are able to reflect on your actions. The fact that you feel fear and experience emotions from further down the scale does not place your dominant level of awareness there. So the next logical step for you would be going for moving into love at 500. The way to get there is to meditate, and condition your mind by reading material from teachers that calibrate above 540, like Eckhart Tolle, David Hawkins and others. Look into courses on developing sensitivity beyond the 5 senses.
The most important thing is to accept your emotions and not give too much attention to where those belong on the scale. Just observe your emotions without judging or ranking, observe without acting on them. Ranking them according to this scale will only fuel the mind and perpetuate them. Having the courage to deeply feel what your emotions are and look them squarely in the eye is what will eventually bring you across the border of 500. It's like yin and yang in chinese philosophy: below 400 is the yin in surplus - emotions without guidance from the intellect, between 400 and 500 it is the yang in surplus that wants to control and master the emotions, at 500 yin and yang finds balance and that leads toward moving to a consiousness beyond the yin/yang polarity at 600+. So that is why I place you in the 400ds, your mind is dominating and wanting to control and work on your emotions, ranking and judging them according to the minds definition of what is beneficient. Your next step is letting go of that need for control and allowing equal weight put on emotions and intellect.
I hope this helped. Sorry Steve for the judgment on the article, I do not mean to put it down, it was a nice try to make the levels of consciousness idea useful with few words for a large topic, and that normally leaves ample grounds for misinterpretation. As my post here probably does too
