[Jane Doe]

I have worked with clients who thought they were abducted and abused, only to find out there was some other traumatic event (ie. father sexually abusing) that they were covering up.

That’s very interesting.

The stories of being at the mercy of "bad" aliens are typically exagerated, just like the real stories of UFO's are typically not taken seriously. All of which says more about human consciousness than anything else.

My problem with dismissing all stories of “bad aliens” as being exaggerations is that a lot of people have reported having unpleasant encounters. Actually, dismissing all “bad alien stories” as exaggerations is just like dismissing all alien stories, good and bad, as being made up. If a lot of people report an event, it is something to pay attention to.

Actually i have seen a UFO in the sky before i totally forgot about this but the thing is when i turn to look somewhere else only for a split second and looked back it was gone. Which may hint to it being a psychological projection It was Carl Jung that said its people projecting Mandala's into the sky.

I don’t think that something being a psychological projection means that it is any less real. I don't know if that was what you were getting at, but it’s real in a different sort of way that most people dismiss...

I'm wondering what sort of proof you offer for aliens (or intelligent design) having nothing to do with it.

What proof do you have that aliens DO muck about with our genes? I believe in a lot of crazy ****, but I don’t like to believe in things unless I have at least ONE reason. I’m not dismissing the possibility, but there are a lot of possibilities out there. For me to take a possibility seriously I have to have a reason, even one reason.

I'm agnostic about Darwinistic evolution now, although I used to believe in it when I was younger.

I hope when you speak of “Darwinistic evolution,” you don’t mean social darwanism. Social Darwanism was not even what Darwin had in mind—that was people misinterpreting his theory. Evolution has no goal. There is no species that is “more evolved” than another, although you might say a species is more complex than another. Evolution has a lot to do with chance and a lot to do with opportunities. What Darwin proposed was that, given vast amounts of time, small changes will accumulate in populations. Today, that’s really not a radical idea.

I have seen enough evidence to prove micro-evolution to me but I have not found any evidence to preclude factors other than context, environment and actions. I'm not trying to provoke anything, I just find objective evolution info hard to find.

I really don’t get what you mean by “objective evolution info.” Do you think that evolution theorists have some sort of agenda? You could try buying a textbook about human origins, if you really want to understand what evolution does and does not entail.