Quote:
Originally Posted by ticktockclok  You guys still do not understand anarchy.
It merely means there would be an absence of a monopoly on force. People could choose whatever system they wanted to live in.
silicontoad: No, we're not against what government has become, we're against government. And you probably should be confused about right/left wing politics. It's a stupid idea; it's too black and white. I saw one of these "political maps" with a 3-d plane, if I find it, I'll show it to you.
Thanks to the rational people who are in this discussion- Scin, Iksander, silicontoad. Answering your doubts now will help me answer other's in the future. |
So no governing body at all?
I mean I think most government have well overstepped their boundrys on what they can and cannot do. I just want to understand your ideology a bit better. I don't think anarchy can work, but then I don't know too much about it.
So lets say we get rid of the government, all government bodies, agencies and funding as it has been established, which is what I'm understanding you are putting forward as anarchy.
Let's say the water main in my street busts, who do I call to fix it?