You guys still do not understand anarchy.
Anarchy would not be pure chaos, or "bedlam" as Shamou put it.
It merely means there would be an absence of a monopoly on force. People could choose whatever system they wanted to live in.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Scin The only way anarchy could exist is if there was only one person in the world. The reason for this is that human nature naturally gravitates toward control and order; evidence for this can be seen hundreds of thousands of times throughout history. Genghis Khan is a good example of what can rise out of anarchy. |
Genghis Khan. Khan means ruler. Doh.
silicontoad: No, we're not against what government has become, we're against government. And you probably should be confused about right/left wing politics. It's a stupid idea; it's too black and white. I saw one of these "political maps" with a 3-d plane, if I find it, I'll show it to you.
Thanks to the rational people who are in this discussion- Scin, Iksander, silicontoad. Answering your doubts now will help me answer other's in the future.