For me, Anarchism is just the lack of top-down orders from the government.
It has it's good qualities and it has its bad qualities.
anarchism in my mind fosters community and independence of local communities much better than a highly industrialized government. It allows for the pursuit of the self better than a highly industrialized government because a highly industrialized government changes the person to conform to it and not the other way around.
Anarchism would be considered more natural than government and closer to the conditions of nature and Darwinism.
That said, it fails in certain areas. Anarchism by definition doesn't do anything on a big scale real well. Anarchism won't make interstates or battleships. There are some things that need to be industrialized to a certain extent for efficiency reasons.
Quote:
|
The problem with Anarchists is they need something to hate. If Anarchists ruled, it would be paradoxical!
|
That statement is illogical by definition. Anarchists don't rule anything because once they do they cease to be anarchists. They also don't need something to hate, they just hate being oppressed like everyone else hates being oppressed. You could make the same argument for any other group of people not entirely docile in their political views.
As a society we need to move closer to anarchism. Our government is way too big and is ineffective due to its industrialization. We would be better off shifting to a more natural and organic method of organization because it would allow for more freedom and for people to fulfill themselves better.