[AndyMartin]

I find it fascinating that the law of attraction is described as scientific yet for months I've seen people here puzzling over their results. Steve and every other LoA teacher out there has offered very specific techniques they they have personally validated, and yet they're not working for everyone.

Yes, we can play the blame game, and we do: What did I do wrong? What did that guy on the forums do wrong? What did that teacher say that's wrong? But in the end, we have to trust that people capable of living in this complex world are capable of following rather simple instructions. Which leaves us to question our understanding and our methods.

I'm curious whether it's just a handful of teachers or whether there are more people out there interested in coming to understand the law of attraction at a deeper level, a more fundamental and universal, teachable level? (I'm actually curious about the same thing with regard to psychic ability, receptivity to altered states of consciousness, etc. but that's for later...) Because part of the problem is that all of these teaching models were developed based primarily on a single person's experience, supported by limited self-selecting participants.

After the emergence of new principles follows the refinement. The scientific method took hundreds of years to refine to the point where it's useful for studying invisible particles. We -- the human collective -- need to take this to the next level if we really want it to make an impact on a global scale.

So I'm curious...is there anybody else out there thinking about the need to get more to the heart of the law of attraction? What thoughts and questions have you had?