Ok under the subjective reality model, we are all one. One for all, all for one. We have a singular consciousness, and we are all a part of that. At least, our physical manifestation, our egos, and our 'minds.' But consciousness transcends that in that there is ONLY ONE. So I (in reference to my ego and physical body) am just a manifestation of your consciousness. But when I say your consciousness, I really mean mine as well... since.. well... we are ALL ONE. So I intend to get a job (btw I'm not really trying to get a job, I'm just using this as an example) but I think about all the other potential applicants, I'm going to manifest conflict, because I think about possible conflicts.
What I'm saying is, how can I intend to get a job if there can only be one? I guess what I'm saying is... if I intend to get a job, and think of only getting that job and not of potential conflicts, I will get it (of course in its own perfect time, for the highest good of all)? I may not see it initially but I'll eventually get it right? I suppose its alright if I believe there can only be one person fulfilling that job at a time, but I guess that doesn't necessarily mean I won't ever get the job (i.e. in its own perfect time).
I guess what's conflicting me right now is the fact that if I intend good health for say... my dying aunt (once again I don't have a dying aunt, just an example), would that be selfish? Since if I only intend good health for my aunt, would that also imply I am NOT intending good health for all? In that way I breed conflict right? Since we are all one by subjective reality, shouldn't I really be intending good health for all and not just for one person? Or if I intend good health for myself, that does not intend good health for everyone else, again conflict. What do you think?
__________________ "Will you take the road to light — or the road to darkness?"
"Neither. I'm taking the middle road."
"You mean the twilit road to nightfall?"
"No...The road to dawn." |