Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha  The wavelength of the light would still matter for various physical experiments. Colors as defined today over the wavelength would still make sense.
The color wheel on the other hand wouldn't since it is based on the way our eyes work.
Did money existed 10000 years ago?
Did communismn existed 2000 years ago?
Did digital computers existed 1000 years ago?
Do the book that Steve is going to write already exists at the moment?
If God is love and love is God we don't need God anymore because we have to words that mean the same thing. |
Our perception of the color wheel is based off of the way our minds work, not our eyes. Our eyes work based off of what our mids signal to them, as well as what our eyes signal back. This is why people people blinded from birth still see in their dreams, but they don't see what we see. the elements of the color wheel are actually stronger in reality than what we percieve, not weaker or nonexistant. That's just the way we would look at it from our eyes, which is the point i've been trying to make.
And my other point was that the wavelegths being important for physical experiments and needed to make sense, wasn't my point. Again, the entire (small) outline that I gave about the colors and their relationship to one another had absolutely nothing to do whatsoever with the colors, in any way, shape, or form. I was talking about the workings of the first existence in relationship to the last existence, and the colorwheel demonstrates this easier than other things, if I cared about what colors make what or how far away each color actually was to one another, i would have either talked about it, or i wouldn't have braught it up at all. Sinse i didn't, then it didn't matter to my point. That's point #1.
Point #2, based off of you're second quote. I said DEFINE. I said define It's overall USEFULLNESS. Not weather or not it EXISTED. Something's
usefullness to
Humans dosen't DEFINE It's USEFULLNESS in life. that's what I was saying.
-Do animals know what money is 10,000 years ago or today?
-Do animals know what communism is today or 200 years ago?
-Do animals know what a digital computer is today or 1,000 years ago?
-Do animals know how to read now or in the futute? Do they care what a book is?
Now, are these things usefull, or just usefull to us humans?
Ofcourse, it's all up to the belief weather or not humans are far superior to animals or not. I believe that a computer is usefull because it helps human beings live there lives easier, and that if an animal dosen't understand them, it dosen't mean the animal isn't going to survive without them, unlike us, who would have a hard time.
God's overall (remember, I'm using the word overall here) usefullness isn't defined by
our views of what he would be usefull for. If we somehow find that
we don't have any use for him, that dosen't mean he isn't usefull.
And on you're last point, (even though you weren't quoting me) That's like saying that Love isn't needed. God is love means that when you love, you're fulfilling the will of God. Now, we can analyze what God actually is all we want to, but everyone already has their own views, which is fine, because everyone has their own view to what love is, which is fine aswell. As long as we love each other and not hate. I don't think I'll hear a husband say to their wife anytime soon "honey, I don't really love you, it's just that our brain signals complement each other" because he'd be missing the point, and the same applies to God.