Quote:
|
If people elect representatives to form a government, it is a given they should be entrusted to act in the people's best interests and take care of national security.
|
Given the power of the non elected bureaucratic and the corruption through campaign finance money the US becomes every day less democratic.
When a president who campaigned on furthering the rule of law starts targeting his own citizens with assassination far away from active battlefield then I find it hard to argue that he has the
Lastly the US isn't supposed to be a pure democracy. The founders wrote a document that outlined the system that they wanted to created.
Using the free press for political change is part of the way the system is supposed to function. US elected officials violate on the other hand many articles of the constiution.
Even if the president could claim that he has a democratic mandate for killing US citizens far away from an active battlefield he would still violate the principles of the US constitution. Wikileaks on the other hand doesn't but plays according to the rules that got set up by the founders.
Quote:
|
Each sovereign state is entitled to have its own national security policy, and elected leaders should be given some trust to get on with it.
|
Why should elected leaders who
lie to the people that elected them given trust? Why should the US citizens not know how much their leaders lie to them when those leaders wage war?
Why does the world work better when citizens believe the lies of their government instead of holding the government accountable?
Quote:
|
Each sovereign state is entitled to have its own national security policy,
|
When it commits war crimes the way the US is doing I don't think that it's entitled to form it's own national security policy without outside pressure.
Quote:
|
The next thing, we’ll be having Google cameras in our bedrooms, in the interest of free, open information for all!
|
No, that certainly not the hacker philosophy that drives Wikileaks.
Exposing government information is something different than exposing private information. Different people advocate either side.
As a political force the hacker community via outlets such as Wikileaks is rather the only chance to prevent total government surveillance.