View Single Post
Old 11-04-2010, 02:21 AM   #28 (permalink)
LostMyMap
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 2,944
LostMyMap has a reputation beyond reputeLostMyMap has a reputation beyond reputeLostMyMap has a reputation beyond reputeLostMyMap has a reputation beyond reputeLostMyMap has a reputation beyond reputeLostMyMap has a reputation beyond reputeLostMyMap has a reputation beyond reputeLostMyMap has a reputation beyond reputeLostMyMap has a reputation beyond reputeLostMyMap has a reputation beyond reputeLostMyMap has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Indiana View Post
If he was so dead set against children, HE should have been the one to have the invasive medical procedure to ensure that he didn't find himself in this situation. Apparently he didn't want to go to the trouble, or to the trouble of telling his wife he did not want children for fear that he would lose his access to regular sex, or something.

He didn't do that, and now he has two living, breathing dependent children (TWO, I repeat. He did not even get the snip after the first child, when it became evident that a) his wife was able to get pregnant on contraception and b) they had conflicting ideas about the way forward in the instance that she did fall pregnant).
I was out on an after dark jog just now, and I was thinking exactly this. Snip, snip...
LostMyMap is offline   Reply With Quote