lol, not sure why I'm responding to this but oh well... |
If I'm watching a film called Hyde where the film is based on Dr. Jekyl and Mr Hyde, and I switch it off and Dr. Jekyl and Mr. Hyde is on TV... that's a synchro.
Or if a lead actress has only been in 2 films, one I'm watching and the other is on TV as I switch off the film, then that's a synchronicity.
Those are the two examples I used previously.
You're just saying that if there was a shoe in a film, which there always is, and then after the film I go to the closet and see my shoes that that's a synchro.
The obviousness of the difference in weighting and how you don't immediately see that should be the reason why I no longer reply to anything you say from now on as you are most likely suffering from some kind of mental disability. Which is fine, there's places for people like you but an intelligent discussion is not one of them.
LOL ... poor little man, trying to proof his hypothesis using "obviousness" as an argument, speaks about "intelligent discussion" ... ha-ha-ha!
P.S. No offense, here is your mental disorder: Remote Diagnosis Disorder