Originally Posted by Angela
Of course they are free to agree or disagree. So then how is it not ok for Steve to fully express his evaluations about others (with which people are free to agree or disagree) in his own newsletter, but ok for you to fully express your evaluations (with which people are free to agree or disagree) on a public forum?
What is the not ok-ness about it?
As I said...it didn't seem like he was making it free for all to decide.
It seemed like he was telling everyone what a crappy goal is by giving examples, and making it sound like if they made goals like this then they aren't awesome, as he sees it... which is what I objected to.
I'm not saying everyone has to agree with me either! You're putting words into my mouth really.