View Single Post
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 04-26-2007, 10:26 PM
Mr.Mustache Mr.Mustache is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 126
Mr.Mustache is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steve Pavlina View Post
I believe the lenses themselves are creative; they don't just passively observe reality. In a single uniform universe, the idea of either-or may be true. But if our lenses allow us to access and even create different potential realities, then there's no contradiction between opposites. A multiverse is more flexible than a universe. Hard to say which one we're in right now.
Ok, I suppose you could create a totally meaningless reality but either god exists or does not exist in a "singularverse" or "multiverse". So, if you choose the athiest lens and there is a god is some way, shape or form then the athiest lens becomes a very poor one indeed. So, theoretically a certain opposite like matter or anti-matter may not exist in a certain universe or reality but you had better accept that the physical "perception" of reality has those opposites as part of its core ideas/assumptions. You can't be ignorant of the whole with any or your lenses you know what I'm saying?
Reply With Quote