Hi Brutha,
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha 
Let take an example. I go to an therapist who advertises that he ask his imaginary friend for an second opinion. Even when I belief that this imaginary friend doesn't exist outside his mind I am still okay with his service as long as his clients get satisfied.
I would put talking to ghosts when giving advice in a similar camp.
Aaron's claims are in a different realm.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha I meant with "all those problem": All problem it claims to cure. |
Thank you for taking the time to clarify this point which I misunderstood.
Putting it into context requires the first part of the sentence
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha Its is one thing to say: I have the cure to all those problems, but I don't know why the cure works. Another thing is to say: With the help of a method that is based on Quantum Physics I can cure all those problems. |
Which goes with the first part I've requoted.
So I understand that you put talking to ghosts and imaginary friends into one category and Aaron's claims about quantum physics into a different category.
To me, ghosts and imaginary friends fall into a category of not being accepted by conventional science and would go into the 'unbelievable category' by the scientific community.
To you, Aaroon's quantum physics falls into the 'unbelievable category'.
Therefore I 'assume' (a dangerous word that
) that something has convinced you that there is some merit to ghosts. I assume that would be first hand or second hand anecdotal evidence, reading/study of the subject, or it just 'feels' right.
Is that correct?
You have mentioned are that you okay 'as long as his clients get satisfied' and 'is often enough right to have a good reputation among her custumers'. I would suggest that the majority of customers who have tried paths are satisfied even though the 'science' may be wacky (conventionally unproven like ghosts).
Thank you for your time and patience in answering my questions.
Apologies to Coronet for taking the thread off topic
Best regards
Alan