View Single Post
Old 04-09-2007, 01:59 PM   #25 (permalink)
Brutha
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 8,749
Brutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
That is, my point is that quantum physics itself is something that does not produce currently measurable results. So it would be difficult for anyone to back up a claim that's based on quantum physics to a degree that's scientifically acceptable.
Either you think that his method produces results that are measurable or it doesn't.

Quote:
Of course, results on a quantum level that are so small that they are curerntly immeasurable nevertheless may have a significant impact on the non-quantum level - that is one of the most interesting things about quantum physics.
The current scientific consensus is that even results that are measurable on a quantum level aren't great enough to effect macroscopic (non-quantum) events. I don't see how results that are smaller than those could effect macroscopic events?
Their are some claims that could be easily back uped. For example the change in DNA. DNA normally doesn't change in humans so you can take DNA for and after the PATH therapy and compare it in a labor. Then you make a model how the PATH therapy changes the DNA and predict DNA changes in the next subject. You give those DNA samples to an accepted labor and let them check your thesis.
If you are right you do the thing also with a few other laboratioriums. That will give you press (word of mouth advertising) all around the world, and would produce a gigantic increase in your sales. All for a few thousand bucks.

Sure the question whether quantum physics is involed would still be open. But to a second question:
How does he know that quantum physics is involed. He should be able to tell, even when the method he uses wouldn't be at the level of scientific proof.
Quote:
You also don't 'have to' accept the explanation given by paths to accept that paths (by whatever means, even by placebo) is getting a majority of satisfied customers.
Let take an example. I go to an therapist who advertises that he ask his imaginary friend for an second opinion. Even when I belief that this imaginary friend doesn't exist outside his mind I am still okay with his service as long as his clients get satisfied.
I would put talking to ghosts when giving advice in a similar camp.

Aaron's claims are in a different realm.

Quote:
which implies you read somewhere that paths had stated "I can cure all those problems".

I have read several times that at the moment, paths have not been able to get it to work 100% for all people, so I was interested if you read a post by paths which stated the opposite.
I meant with "all those problem": All problem it claims to cure.
Brutha is offline   Reply With Quote