Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha  I would also agree with you that results of PATH are so small (for all pratical purposes zero) that they can't be measured by our very complicated scientific devices, but that doesn't seem to be your point? |
Nope. That wasn't my point, or what I was saying. I was simply addressing one thing in your post:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha But claiming you have a method that is based on Quantum Physics without backing up the claim, give the impression that something shall be hidden.
That is the step from ignorance to malice. |
That is, my point is that quantum physics itself is something that does not produce currently measurable results. So it would be difficult for anyone to back up a claim that's based on quantum physics to a degree that's scientifically acceptable.
Since I don't know have any actual knowledge of what the results of PATHs are, I cannot say whether or not they are so small as to be incapable of being measured by our current scientific instruments. Of course, results on a quantum level that are so small that they are curerntly immeasurable nevertheless may have a significant impact on the non-quantum level - that is one of the most interesting things about quantum physics.
But like I said, I don't have any knowledge as to what the actual results of PATHs are. I was only talking about the challenge of backing up a claim that's based on quantum physics.
Belle
