View Single Post
Old 04-08-2007, 09:46 PM   #19 (permalink)
Brutha
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 8,749
Brutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud ofBrutha has much to be proud of
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angela View Post
And would you say the same thing about Erin, who charges a pretty penny for her readings which stimulate insights? About a hynotherapist, who charges substantially for help in quitting smoking? About a massage therapists, whose ministrations suggest muscles relax?
First Erin, the most difficult. Lets take the point of someone who doesn't believe in ghosts:
She talks to beings she imagines and that are only in her mind. I give her that she beliefs that those ghosts are real. She gives advice to people based on her talking. The advice is based on her Intuition instead of analytical thinking. That means it isn't always the best advice but Erins is often enough right to have a good reputation among her custumers.

If Erin would start to justify her reading with bogus quantum physics talk and would quote people who make bogus claims that they could back up if their claim would be true, but that they don't back up because the can't, I would have a problem with her services.

The hynotherapist he tells the subject what he is doing. He hynotises the subject and tells the subconscious to make the changes. I don't see anything wrong with that. He does exactly what he advertises.

The therapist does also do exactly what he advertises. In addition most message therapists sell messages instant of muscle relaxation.
Quote:
Neither Erin or these other service providers would offer a no-questions asked money back guarantee, I don't think.
A lot of hypnotherapists do have a no-questions asked money back guarantee, because they believe their approach is effective enough.
Quote:
And none of these services lives in the realm of hard & fast provable science.
He enters the real with of science with his claims. He does more than saying PATH helps every aspect of your life. That wouldn't be as controversial as his claims.
He could get a patent and share his method without any fear, if his method would work in the way he claims.
Its is one thing to say: I have the cure to all those problems, but I don't know why the cure works. Another thing is to say: With the help of a method that is based on Quantum Physics I can cure all those problems.
I claim that I someone can speak with ghosts is acceptable. It a well known fact that some people with mental problems see strange things. Its okay when they thing those mental ellusions are real.
But claiming you have a method that is based on Quantum Physics without backing up the claim, give the impression that something shall be hidden.
That is the step from ignorance to malice.

Last edited by Brutha; 04-08-2007 at 09:50 PM.
Brutha is offline   Reply With Quote