@ Kevin: Why would Paul lie re: what they said? I think he's actually been pretty gracious in admitting he misunderstood that it was not a "100% no questions" asked guarantee, and it makes sense that in this case the company is refunding even though he did not follow his end to a T. It would be foolish of them not to, and now they can reject refund requests with a clear conscience if people don't follow the instructions.
I've been following these threads from day 1 and it's been interesting. I have to say though, while it does not bother me that affiliates post here as long as it's transparent, and your analogy re: the car/gasoline and PATHS/spirulina is an apt one, but I find your whole tone very annoying. |