View Single Post
Old 05-18-2010, 03:06 PM   #11 (permalink)
Criseyde
Family Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,157
Criseyde is an amazing contributorCriseyde is an amazing contributorCriseyde is an amazing contributorCriseyde is an amazing contributorCriseyde is an amazing contributorCriseyde is an amazing contributorCriseyde is an amazing contributorCriseyde is an amazing contributorCriseyde is an amazing contributorCriseyde is an amazing contributorCriseyde is an amazing contributor
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutha View Post
It criticizes literature people who want to use neuroscience. The problem doesn't lie with neuroscience but with those literature people who don't understand neuroscience.
Literature theory is about just so stories about stories.
That's true, it is most directly criticizing literary theorists who want to use things they don't understand -- but I think this author's argument applies whenever you want to apply neuroscientific theories to actual human behavior in all its glorious variation, which is why I posted it.
Criseyde is offline   Reply With Quote