Quote:
Originally Posted by yossarian  If they polarize towards the dark, whether they do it THINKING they are under "Pavlina polarity" or some other polarity, they are doing the behaviour that causes them to polarize, and they change to look like this: |
Negative polarity and darkworker polarity maybe different things.
I only say this out of trying to understand steve's model. Since he wrote that darkworkers are not causing themselves or others harm.
I think you are argueing for the classical negative/positive polarity and lumping Steve's ideas as the same thing. Which they aren't right? If a darkworker can become more effective, then a darkworker isn't the same axis as negative polarity.
To define negative polarity, isn't that just saying going in the direction of something that doesn't help or work and may cause harm? I don't think Steve was trying to say, polarize darkworker and make sure you are causing things to get worse. He did say that is the syndrome of darkworkers, that can happen.