In the classical model i'm talking about negative is not about hurting people.
It's about selfishness.
It just so happens that selfishness leads to hurting people.
Let's say you have an axis - a line - that indicates your polarity.
|------------------------------------------------------------|
The right side of this line is total positive polarization. Left side is total negative.
People start out here:
|-----------------------------X-----------------------------|
If they polarize towards the dark, whether they do it THINKING they are under "Pavlina polarity" or some other polarity, they are doing the behaviour that causes them to polarize, and they change to look like this:
|----------------------X-------------------------------------|
Eventually they run up against an obstacle and they have to make a choice.
|-------------HX---------------------------------------------|
The H is an obstacle that the person has to pass. He passes it by rededicating himself to the negative polarity - by proving that he is dedicated to selfishness.
In this case the H represents a decision between hurting someone for personal gain (like say, theft) and not doing it. The universe provided the person with the opportunity, and if the person abstains from the opportunity, he will depolarize like this:
|-------------H-----X---------------------------------------|
If he seizes the opportunity and commits theft for his own selfishness, then he instead looks like this:
|---------X--H-----------------------------------------------|
|