Quote:
Originally Posted by yossarian  Oh btw I forgot to mention..
The "dangerous confusion" IMO is starting to walk down the dark path without realising the full implications of that path. Walking down it while thinking that you aren't eventually going to be heavily drawn towards directly hurting others. If you go far enough, soon enough you'll reach a point where you have to enslave others, and you'll be stuck between a rock and a hard place. |
I suspect going down the dark path to the point of enslaving others is not what Steve's darkworker idea is. It is more like Steve's darkworker syndrome. But I can agree with your statements on their own - negative paths of always looking out of only yourself, causes everyting to get worse.
Quote:
|
Darkwork under Pavlina Polarity is about absorbing energy and hoarding it and intentional selfishness, and these things are negative polarity whether you call them "darkworking (a new concept)" or not. The selfishness without hurting others is basically just ankle-deep negative polarity.
|
The Pavlina darkworker is also told to avoid the syndrome. A healthy Pavlinian darkworker has been able to not have classic (evil) negative polarity.
Quote:
|
The choice will be between depolarization (which is an expensive readjustment) and harming someone (which some people may not want to do).
|
A negative polarity person, by definition, is going about harming, that's what defines that state. Negative means hurting or not being healthy (same thing pain/bad health).
Depolarization - I don't understand what you mean by that. Depolarization of what model? Pavlina? or classical (evil/good)?