Quote:
Originally Posted by Acting Like Godot  But that's another mistake which you habitually make, in different forms.
The reason for picking something that doesn't work 100% of the time is that at least it works 50%, or 70% or 90% of the time. That's still infinitely better than doing nothing, a decision that will yield you 0%.
To put it another way -
1. you could have 20 interests and go nowhere with any of them; or
2. you could have 5 interests and go somewhere with each of them; or
3. you could have 1 interest and go a very long way with it.
It's debatable whether (2) or (3) is preferable, but what's clear is that both (2) and (3) are superior to (1).
Unfortunately it sounds like you're consistently choosing (1). In your search for the "best" possible option, you consistently end up picking the worst possible option. |
I came up with my own analogy for all my ideas the other day, imagine yourself in a shooting range, at first when you're starting out you will miss the target, but eventually if keep shooting you will hit the target. So just keep on firing!