[dor]

Originally Posted by One

Aaron, I am having an exceedingly difficult time keeping incredulity from affecting my posts. Now you seem to have asked me to butt out for the questions I've asked. You've made some very grand claims. I should hardly be expecting you to pay for electricity at home. After all, so far you've claimed:

*Physicists everywhere are totally wrong.
*You have devices which prove this.
*Physicists are incapable of seeing this.
*You have (in effect) free energy.
*You have discovered the universal language of the subconscious.
*PATHS can modify human DNA.
*PATHS can enhance your sex life
*PATHS Make me look younger
*PATHS can increase my intuition and psychic abilities
*PATHS can modify gland secretions in the body.
*There is currently a cure for diabetes.
*PATHS can lessen diabetes symptoms.
On further investigation I've found that you've also claimed:
*You can turn tap water into a powerful gasoline.

Tom Bearden has in his writings claimed:
*He has unified physics (Einstein failed at this!)
*He can cure cancer
*He invented a device that outputs 7-100 times input power

For all this, you've been unable to provide me with any evidence short of a few crackpots who have to toot their own horn because their work would not stand up in any real journal. People, who after decades of claiming to have fantastic machines, have failed to produce them for anyone to actually see or test.

Mr. Bearden was not 'awarded' anything. He purchased a degree. I wonder if he had to pay for the Vietnam metal as well.

Aaron, some may consider this an insult, but after long and careful consideration and comparison with the dictionary definition, I am forced to conclude that Aaron Murakami is a charlatan.


You will, no doubt, LOL at this and quote some poor dead scientist out of context.

One can only do so much in the service of the consumer. If the nature of your claims have not been made obvious now to those reading there is nothing further I can do.

Thanks for the ride.

Thank you for this very worthy post! I too am always suspect of people who get their degrees from diploma mills- either they stand on merit - like Edison or they get real ones, but the short cut from a diploma mill that Yev pointed out is a con.

I don't think it is an insult either, (unlike his dor blashphemy! ) but after examining his posts, I concluded I thought he was neither trustworthy or crediable.

It could be true! but science in the modern sense did not exist prior to two hundred years ago. No peer reviewed paper has ever claimed the world was flat. Aside-I don't think the educated class believed the world was flat in the time of Columbus. It was a popular belief among the peasants as with many other folk beliefs.

Exactly the world was known to be round since Erastophanese (spelling, its been awhile) who estimated the circumference around the time of Christ. In fact, most every atlantic ocean sailor - Vikings included, must have known the world was round. but fantastic statements like 'everyone thought the world was flat' make better stories.-- and those stories add credibility to equally inaccurate claims

There have been some inventions (i can't believe i am offering information for charlatans to use!) that have been not so much supressed, as ignored - steam technlology around the time of Hero & arcemedies, the ferguson rifle (if adapted by the british they probably would have won the american revolution) and possibly Bucky Fuller's dymaxion car. Bucky made extraorindary claims but backed them up. That's the difference between people outside the system who are crediable and those who are not, like Beardan