Quote:
Originally Posted by Yev  If you believe this is the meaning of a degree, well then I expect you will believe anything. Hell, you might even believe Aaron's "virtual photon flux of the quantum mechanical vacuum". |
Nice insult Yev, maybe you can act like an educated person and keep your insults to yourself, which by such comment proves your lack of understanding of any of this so you might be best suited to look for a thread accepting of your insults or go find a field that you are suited for.
Some Frequently Asked Questions About Virtual Particles VIRTUAL PHOTON STRUCTURE Virtual photons Virtual photon exchange and charge sign Energy Citations Database (ECD) - Energy and Energy-Related Bibliographic Citations
You question the validity of the concept? The virtual particles are not considered real in a physical sense as they are unobservable but DO have observable properties...the effects can be measured and quantified...where source charge comes from...from these virtual photons in their symmetrical state in vacuum space interacting with a dipole breaking their symmetry and causing movement from one potential to another producing real work in the real world. LOL
The term vacuum space is also something not made up by me LOL
electron positron lattice, the crystal universe Phys. Rev. 164 (1967): Werner Israel - Event Horizons in Static... (don't read this one, it is a peer reviewed published journal actually making a reference to vacuum space - LOL)
The Petrov type of a static vacuum space-time near a normal-dominated singularity (another peer reviewed journal actually saying "vacuum space"????)
Again, please keep your insults to yourself I don't appreciate it especially when it is implying that I am lying so you indirectly call me a liar. So be it. Good luck in your search, no point in you hanging around here when I'm making stuff up about virtual photons and vacuum space...you'll just waste your time here and I wouldn't want to do that.